Democrats on the Surface
By
Abdulrazaque Bello-Barkindo
So many things have changed for the worse in Nigeria since 1999. And yet
even though I am inclined to giving the south west a pas mark for their
democratic struggles (having witnessed their struggle for democratisation in
the last two decades) the behaviour of their new champions of democracy
leaves much to be desired. A striking characteristic of the lot is how bad
they are at doing things at which they are supposed to be gurus.
The South west group is obsessed with democracy, yet it does not believe
that a democratic solution to a national calamity will lead us anywhere. As
far as they are concerned, Obasanjos misadventure is a permissible calamity,
just as pro-Abacha campaigners under an American football hooligan once
thought that Nigeria without the tyrant would be dead on delivery. The
latter group was proved wrong by providence as Nigeria continues to exist
long after Abacha and the South west will also be proved wrong when Obasanjo
is eventually impeached or sent packing next year, 2003.
One may not be exact as to when advancing the universal good of our people
began to fall into the hands of those to whom integrity means nothing. And
there are many of them unfortunately, but the cause for cheer is that there
are also many who can take the bull by the horns, to use an old cliché.
The impeachment ultimatum which expired last week revealed a great deal
about the sincerity or lack of it among those who run our national affairs.
It revealed the likes of Governor Lam Adesina who only weeks before would
want Obasanjo impeached for non-performance but as soon as the House set its
machinery in motion he readjusted to a pro Obasanjo position. It also
revealed the ignorance of the army leadership Obasanjo imposed on the
country - a military leadership that pledges its loyalty to those who
appointed it and not the constitution which ensures its continuos existence.
It is a sorry army. How it expects to be allowed to continue after Obasanjo
is a point for the army to ponder. The nation also came face-to-face with
the chicanery of the AD which is fighting tooth and nail to retain a
president who humiliated its own choice for the office.
Most of all, the president himself was exposed. When the entire nation
turned against Obasanjo, he found solace by beating the drums of war calling
his kinsmen to pick up the fight. Before the impeachment saga he was fully
settled among "gambaris." He took Biafra under their leadership. In
spite of
the presence of better soldiers from Sandhurst who were sidelined, he became
second in command through the magnanimity of his northern landlords, and he
eventually became Head of State through their mercy. In fact Yar'adua's
political sagacity, not Obasanjo's inferiority complex led to the smooth
change of batons in 1979, even though Yar'adua himself sided with the
philosophies of Pa Awo but preferred to quickly hop off the scene to avoid a
repeat of Gowon's mistakes. Yet Obasanjo took the credit, eventually
emerging a member of the Eminent Persons Group which finally wrenched South
Africa from the shackles of apartheid.
In 1999, with the intention of pacifying the Yorubas, the north not only
decided to relinquish the presidency but needed the right Yorubaman for the
job. Just out of unfair imprisonment they thought Obasanjo could be trusted.
But the top job in a presidential system is a different ball game altogether
as they were to find out that while Obasanjo could be the right man for
whatever job this is not the right job for the man.
There would not have been any problem with chicken, or a chicken farmer
going home to roost, but the route home must not be paved with hatred or
wrapped in deceit. People in all parts of the world seek to solve their
problems through universally accepted norms of engagement. This basically is
a situation where leadership continues to mean responsibility and the
inalienability of the common good of the people and not just that of cliques
or the leadership. But the polarised reactions to the impeachment ultimatum
a fortnight ago evoke tremendous and indeed frightening ambiguities. The
House was bombarded with unguarded accusations all from one side. The most
ridiculous being the insinuation that an alliance with the military was
responsible for the move.
Coming from a governor, this shows the level to which our present leaders
sink to incriminate one another, which is also reminiscent of the military
"she-brass" who would stab each other in the back just to please
Abacha
during those inglorious days that the nation is striving to put behind it.
The consolation is that, conscious people in our society, including Gani
Fawehinmi, Ebitu Ukiwe and Balarabe Musa have shown that a conspiracy
hatched in hell cannot have angels as witnesses by throwing their weight
behind the action thus withdrawing their support latent or otherwise from a
presidency that was once perceived to be progressive.
Regrettably however, more troubling is for the nation is having to mourn the
absence of the principles that once governed the politics of the south west
leaving them hostage to a president who has since ran out of ideas and
whose spin doctors have proved themselves to be impervious to public
criticism.. A president who respects only one authority - himself, and
describes the constitutional duty of the legislature as a joke! On the
whole, if we ever considered the president and his refuseniks democrats now
we know that they are democrats on the surface. They pay only lip service to
democracy.