Before the Law: Obasanjo and the Aberration of Nigeria's Sexual Taliban 

By 

Obiwu Iwuanyanwu

obiwu@yahoo.com  

About 1887, a man from Ikenne, in Yorubaland of South Western Nigeria, was convicted and sentenced to death for committing adultery with the wife of an Ijebu Ode prince. Without waiting for the consent of the Awujale (the authorizing superior chieftain) as prescribed by law, Awolowo, the stubborn president of the governing Iwarefa executive council of Oshugbo House ordered the execution of the convict. The affronted Awujale got Balogun Kuku (general of the army) to dispatch a punitive expedition, which had the Iledi of Ikenne completely burnt and the Iwarefa authority abrogated.

Iwarefa Awolowo ran away to Ilishan. Awolowo was the grandfather of the late Nigerian politician, Obafemi Awolowo, and a kinsman of the current Nigerian president, Olusegun Obasanjo. The man whose instant death he ordered was his own cousin (Awolowo, Awo, 1960: 19-20). We were never told what happened to the woman with whom the man was said to have committed the adultery.

During the 1966 Nigerian genocide against the Igbo, thousands of Igbo women and children were raped and murdered by rampaging Northern Nigerians all over the cities and bushes of the North. The Nigerian military government headed by Jack Yakubu Gowon, and the Northern Nigerian government under the direction of Usman Katsina and the Islamic partriarch, Aminu Kano, spurred on the atrocities. Throughout the consequent civil war between 1967 and 1970, Nigerian soldiers abducted, assaulted, raped, and killed thousands of Igbo women and children. The story was the same through all the Biafran towns of Eastern Nigeria, from Anioma across the River Niger under the supervision of Murtala Mohammed and Captain Ibrahim Taiwo, to Port Harcourt on the Atlantic coast under the command of Benjamin Adekunle and Olusegun Obasanjo. Up till today the Nigerian government has neither accepted responsibility nor held anyone accountable for the horrendous acts (Okocha, Blood on the Niger, 1994; Iloegbunam, Ironside, 1999).        

At the end of the civil war on January 14, 1970, a young Igbo woman of about 22 ran to the safety net of Obasanjo's entourage, which was on its way to Lagos for the formal surrender of the Republic of Biafra. The woman had pleaded to be rescued from the sexual assault of another Nigerian soldier. Obasanjo's Nigerian Army guards who arrested the soldier narrated how the man had threatened them with his dagger. On the orders of Obasanjo, the soldier was instantly shot in the full view of the entourage. The witnesses to that gruesome murder included Biafra's last Head of State General Philip Effiong, Chief Justice Sir Louis Mbanefo, Inspector-General of Police Patrick Okeke, Chief Mathew T. Mbu, Brigadier Patrick Amadi, Colonel Patrick Anwunah, and Colonel David Ogunewe. Their intense plea for Obasanjo to spare the life of a fellow Nigerian soldier was doused in a ferocious storm of bullets. This incident happened at the Igbo town of Umuchima in Ideato (Effiong, Re-Integration, 1983; Adinoyi-Ojo, In the Eyes of Time, 1997).

Shockingly, Obasanjo boastfully cites his most deplorable war crime to the Ohanaeze Youth Council or Igbo Think Thank as evidence of his love of the Igbo people just to score cheap political point (Vanguard, June 2002; Iloegbunam, Vanguard July 9, 2002). It is rather disturbing that Ghali Umar Na'Abba (speaker of Nigeria's House of Representatives) and Wumi Akintinde (former staff of Nigeria's ministry of defense headquarters) have both called Obasanjo's mental stability to question (Edemodu, The Guardian, July 7, 2002; Akintinde, Nigeria World, August 30, 2002).

Could it be that Obasanjo just shed human blood on purely infantilist braggadocio? Obasanjo has never bothered to find out what the alleged "molestation" or "assault" was for which he had a junior colleague brutally wasted. No questions have ever been asked by the Nigerian authorities under which both Obasanjo and the soldier served. Obasanjo has never explained what messianic delusion granted him the power of life and death over the fallibilities of lesser mortals.

During the 2002 World Population Day celebration, Obasanjo's minister of women affairs and youth development, Aisha Isma'il, spoke of her desire to recommend death sentence for convicted sex offenders in the Nigerian Children's Bill. According to Isma'il: "If they have been raping adults not children, well one can grudgingly understand but not so with three-year olds, it boils down to our journey from our immediate past, when laws were not enforced . I say that such animalistic behavior should not be used as an excuse . Ours is a praying nation, but sins are committed everywhere in the country" (Vanguard, July 15, 2002). In a backwater society severely detached from the emergent DNA scientific tradition, Minister Isma'il does not say how the Obasanjo government could prove that the potential victims of Nigeria's death-chamber are, beyond every shade of doubt, guilty of the sexual offenses for which they must die.

One may need to ask Isma'il if those to be killed will include the Nigerian soldiers who committed crimes against humanity on the orders of Obasanjo in November 1999, by raping women, killing one thousand civilians, and destroying the town of Odi in the Niger Delta? Ten of those women have just gone to court to claim damages for their violation, and the atrocities at Odi are part of the charges for the current impeachment proceedings against Obasanjo by the National Assembly.

As in the earlier case of Awolowo, the lawmakers' spokesman, Farouk Lawan, says that Obasanjo "authorized the deployment of military troops to Odi to massacre innocent citizens without recourse to the National Assembly" (Associated Press, September 4, 2002). More than ten thousand people have been killed since Obasanjo's second coming to power on May 29, 1999, prompting the World Organization Against Torture to call on the United Nations and Commonwealth ministers to investigate his government's role in Nigeria's ethnic and religious clashes.      

Ironically, the same Muslim Aisha Isma'il is at the head of a Nigerian women's campaign agitating in the media for the release of Amina Lawal from the clutches of a stoning death before a cavalier Islamic court of Northern Nigeria. Obasanjo himself, the executive president of the most notable black nation in the world, has continued to equivocate on the serious issue of freeing an innocent woman from the criminal laws of rapacious men. Obasanjo, the "popularly elected" president, has graciously offered to "weep" for Amina Lawal in the event of her impending death by stoning. Obasanjo has about sixteen "wives" and over thirty children, and some of Amina Lawal's judges have at least four wives each and harems of concubines.

Amina Lawal will be stoned to death for responding to her maternal instinct and having only one "fatherless" child to show for her pains. All she will get from President Obasanjo for whom she cast her electoral vote for security and happiness under a democratic government is a slimy bout of useless tears.

Obasanjo has a historical affinity with the villainous past of South Western Nigeria's sexual Taliban of Awolowo, Adekunle, and Taiwo. Isma'il and the Islamic judges have a historical affinity with the villainous past of Northern Nigeria's sexual Taliban of Aminu Kano, Gowon, Usman Katsina, and Murtala Mohammed. What could be the pseudo-logic of the lip service that Obasanjo and his ministers are paying to the urgent need to free Amina Lawal from the blood-lusting jaws of Islamic extremists? That Obasanjo committed murder when he was an Ogun worshiping primitive soldier, long before he became a life-affirming "born-again" civilian president? That they only thought that alleged sexual offenders deserved summary execution, while the absolute powers of phallocratic religious zealots in a kangaroo court are delimited in passing judgments on adulterous women? How is the crime of Amina Lawal's assailants different from the crimes of Adekunle, Awolowo, Gowon, Aminu Kano, Usman Katsina, Murtala Mohammed, Obasanjo, and Taiwo? How is the god of Awolowo and Obasanjo different from the god of Isma'il and Islamic extremists, since their bestial gods have decreed the brutish death of powerless "sex offenders" in the hands of the powerful sex police of rabid religions?             

For the first time in the history of modern Nigeria, some Northern Nigerian Islamic fundamentalist male judges are following on the infamous pattern of Obasanjo, the South Western Nigerian "born-again" Christian male president. They have conspired to execute an increasing number of vulnerable men and women all over Northern Nigeria on exhibitionist charges of rape and adultery. The cases are never fully investigated and the accused are not allowed full rights of attorney to defend themselves. Amina Lawal, a thirty-year old divorced woman whose infant child is presently sucking at her heaving breasts, could be their first victim. Could they have already started picking and piling the stones with which to crush Amina Lawal's baby girl as soon as she is old enough to nurse every woman's feeling for which her poor mother presently sprawls on Katsina's Funtua death row? They have not bothered to explain who is responsible for Amina Lawal's pregnancy outside wedlock for which she is to die a stoning death. What will happen to the father of the unfortunate child while its mother is languishing unto death has not figured in their fanatical equation. Is this Sharia Act's irrationality not typical of "born-again" President Obasanjo's vision and practice of democracy? That was how they had gone to Judah, and said to him, "'Your daughter-in-law Tamar is guilty of prostitution, and as a result she is now pregnant.' Judah said, 'Bring her out and have her burned to death!' As she was being brought out, she sent a message to her father-in-law. 'I am pregnant by the man who owns these,' she said. And she added, 'See if you recognize whose seal and cord and staff these are.' Judah recognized them and said, 'She is more righteous than I, since I wouldn't give her to my son Shelah.' And he did not sleep with her again" (Genesis 38: 24-26). Dare Judah own up to prostituting before Tamar? Dare he submit to the public shame and cringing suffering of the burning death to which he would in a flourish put his helpless daughter-in-law? Again, they went to Jesus and said, "'Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. In the Law Moses (and Mohammed) commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?' . But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, 'If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.' Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground. At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there" (John 8: 3-9).

In the archetypal plot popularized by Shirley Jackson's 1948 tragic thriller, "The Lottery," a woman, that ubiquitous representation of the maligned and marginalized minority, has once again drawn the winning ticket in a masculine game of death. Thus, when the American National Organization of Women exhorts Nigeria that "Rocks are for gardens, not to hurt women," they need to know that Nigeria has always been a jungle where the strongest survives. When the United Nations Development Fund for Women calls on Nigeria's federal government to save its citizens from legal abuse, they should know that the Northern Nigerian Sharia apostles are only the latest in a debased phallocentric tradition of dominance. When Dan Isaacs bewails that "Nigeria's federal government .

has done little to directly challenge them or overturn them" (BBC News, August 29, 2002), the international community should rightly feel scandalized for their role in foisting on Nigerians a man whose antecedents have long been universally known to nourish nothing but callous decadence.

How else should one read the fact that Obasanjo disappeared from Johannesburg just before his appointed meeting on Wednesday, September 4, with Norwegian prime minister, Kjell Magne Bondevik? Why is it that after Bondevik squeezed out time from his crowded program at the world Earth Summit tracking Obasanjo on the global telephone network, the Nigerian president could not make a firm commitment deserving of one head of government to another on freeing Amina Lawal? (Lundgaard and Tisdall, Aftenposten, September 4, 2002). How is Obasanjo's action different from that of the late Nigerian dictator, Sani Abacha, who after reassuring former South African President Nelson Mandela, proceeded to execute Ken Saro-Wiwa and the Ogoni eight as Commonwealth leaders were meeting in Auckland, New Zealand, in 1995? As Obasanjo's army did in Odi, Abacha's soldiers had despoiled South Eastern Nigerian Ogoniland, raping women and children, killing the elderly, and driving the young they could not kill into exile. As Awolowo had done in Ikene, Abacha executed the "Ogoni nine" in total disregard of the thirty-day period of appeal as allowed by law (Saro-Wiwa, A Month and a Day, 1995; Wiwa, In the Shadow of a Saint, 2000; Okonta and Douglas, Where Vultures Feast, 2001).

In short, when young Nigerians, like Tokunbo Awoshakin, Okezie Chukwumerije, Tonye David-West, and Faruk Sarkinfada, are forced to abandon their daily choirs to theorize on the sudden resurrection of the NOK Culture or Stone Age Modernity in Northern Nigeria, what they are saying is that the Stone Age "born again" weeping President Olusegun Obasanjo belongs in a maximum stonewall jail where he had been or mental asylum where he should be or anywhere but the Aso Rock Presidential Villa, Abuja.   Why are the Islamic extremists of Northern Nigeria following the aberrant career of Obasanjo to pour their seeds on the Sahara Desert where they shrink and shrivel and die in hot sands? What is the mystical handwriting on the ground? Do they think the line in the sand will wash away with the web of sand dunes? It sinks in the ground and corrodes the earth. It permeates and simmers and bids its time. What Nigeria's sexual Talibans are about to do to Amina Lawal - what they did to thousands of Igbo women and children for which the North and their Southern accomplices have remained cursed - is such that will wipe out a whole generation. How many stones can they throw on the frazzled flesh and broken bones of a fallen woman? And how would they stifle the ringing strain of her haunting voice that will stick to their brains and stand in the storm of rage over their heads and that of their children and children's children like the unhurried and yet inimitable Northern Star?               

Nnamdi Azikiwe, the Ahmadu Bello-acknowledged father of our dream Nigeria, once cited the immortal verse of Claude McKay that I paraphrase here. Before the Stone Age lawlessness of Obasanjo; before the reckless bloodlust of the Sharia Act; before the eyes of the watching world, the eyes of Amina Lawal's infant child, and the eyes of the rest of us; before the then and now and the future continuous of many more inventions imaginable and unimaginable of all evil regimes everywhere; before and behind and beyond the law of seal and cord and staff, lies the open grave.