Operationalising Open Government Partnership (OGP) In Nigeria
Otive Igbuzor, PhD
Federal Partnership Facilitator, Governance and Civil Society, PERL
The President Muhammadu Buhari administration was inaugurated in Nigeria at a time that the country was faced with monumental challenges that have blocked its development leading to poor service delivery to citizens. One of the major driving forces for the development blockade is lack of open, transparent, accountable and responsive government. It is well known that if government and citizens embrace open government principles in a tailored stakeholder engagement, then the blockades will be dealt with and reform will take place that will lead ultimately to effective policy, effective budget and effective implementation. One of the pillars of the President Muhammadu Buhari administration is governance and security. The other pillars are economic reform, infrastructure, social development, environment and states/regional development.
The Buhari administration is committed to three top priorities of security, economy and fighting corruption. In its effort at fighting corruption, President Muhammadu Buhari made a commitment at the London Anti-Corruption Summit on 12th May, 2016 in three overarching areas:
1. Exposing Corruption
a. Beneficial Ownership Transparency: Nigeria commits to establish a public central register of company beneficial ownership information; a database of registered companies, charities and trustees and bilateral arrangement for access to beneficial ownership information.
b. Preventing the facilitation of corruption: Nigeria commits to deploying public-private information sharing that will help to detect, prevent and disrupt money laundering linked to corruption.
c. Public Procurement and Fiscal Transparency: Nigeria commits to the full implementation of Open Contracting Data standard.
d. Extractive Industry (Oil and Solid Mineral): Nigeria commits transparency and accountability in the oil and gas sector in line with its ongoing work as required under EITI.
e. Tax Transparency: Nigeria commits to sign up to the Common reporting standard initiative and join the Addis Tax Initiative as well as review penalties against the enablers of tax evasion.
2. Punish the corrupt and support the victims who have suffered from corruption
· Prevent corrupt bidders from wining contracts by establishing accessible central databases of companies with final convictions and sharing information on corrupt bidders.
· Asset recovery, asset return and transparent management of returned assets.
· Payments to affected states and victims of corruption.
3. Drive out the culture of corruption wherever it exists
· Foster integrity in international sports by joining the International Sport Integrity Partnership.
· Promote integrity on our institutions by launching a practitioner partnership on institutional integrity, co-ordinated by OECD in extractives, health, education, public service and anti-corruption institutions.
· Promote institutional integrity and partnership between the UK Auditor General’s office and Nigeria’s office of the Auditor General as well as between Nigeria’s anti-corruption institutions and the UK National Crime Agency.
· Support innovations in the use of technology to fight corruption and
· Support to international system .
After the submit, Nigeria through the office of the Attorney General and Minister of Justice submitted a letter of intent to join the Open Government Partnership (OGP). On 27th July, 2016, Nigeria was confirmed as a participating country by the OGP Secretariat.
OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP
The Open Government Partnership was launched on 20th September, 2011 to provide an international platform for domestic reformers to make their governments more open, accountable and responsive to citizens. The partnership is governed by four key principles:
· Transparency: Information on government activities and decisions is open, comprehensive, timely and freely available to the public, and meets basic open data standards.
· Accountability: Rules, regulations, and mechanisms are in place that call upon government actors to justify their actions, act upon criticisms or requirements made of them and accept responsibility for failure to perform.
· Citizen Participation: Governments seek to mobilize citizens to engage in public debate, provide input, and make contributions that lead to more responsive and effective governance.
· Technology and Innovation: Governments embrace the importance of new technologies in driving innovation, providing citizens with open access to technology, and increasing their capacity to use technology.
The Open Government Partnership (OGP) was launched by eight founding governments of Brazil, Indonesia, Philippines, Mexico, Norway, South Africa, United Kingdom and United States when they formally adopted the Open Government Declaration and announced their national action plans. Since the formal launching, the number of countries that have joined the partnership has grown to 69 representing more than a third of the world’s population.
For any country to join the partnership, it must meet the eligibility criteria, embrace open government declaration and develop a national action plan with concrete open government reform commitments developed with public consultation and commitment to independent reporting on progress. The minimum eligibility criteria is that the government must exhibit a demonstrated commitment to open government in four key areas, as measured by objective indicators and validated by independent experts. The four areas are fiscal transparency; access to information; income and asset disclosure and citizen engagement. In terms of fiscal transparency, there should be timely publication of essential budget documents. There should be an access to information law that guarantees the public’s right to information. In addition, there should be rules that require public disclosure of income and assets for elected and senior public officials. Finally, there should be basic protections for civil liberties and an openness to citizen engagement and participation in policymaking and governance.
OPERATIONALISING OGP IN NIGERIA: NATIONAL ACTION PLAN
Having been admitted into the Open Government Partnership (OGP), Nigeria is expected to prepare a national action plan. The national action plan is expected to be created by government and civil society by identifying commitments that are most important to the context of Nigeria. The preparation of the national action plan should be through a multi-stakeholder process, with active engagement of citizens and the civil society. National Action Plans are at the very heart of OGP. It is therefore important that the national action plans are ambitious, effective and relevant to open government.
Nigeria has started the process of producing a National Action Plan. The Ministry of Justice is co-ordinating activities to operationalise OGP in Nigeria. On 28th July, 2016, the Ministry of Justice organised a meeting stakeholders on the implementation of the outcome of the London Summit on Anti-corruption and the Open Government Partnership (OGP). At the meeting, among other things agencies and civil society organisations were identified to be on the OGP National Steering Committee. In addition, there are plans to hold a retreat for all members of the steering committee and other stakeholders in October, 2016.
EXPERIENCE OF OPEN GOVERNMENT PROGRAMMES
As noted above, the four key areas of Open Government are transparency (Open data); accountability (responsive government), citizen participation and the use of technology. Research and experience shows that the programmes to achieve open government principles must be carefully planned and implemented otherwise the required results will not be achieved. First and foremost, it is important to focus on both tactical and strategic approaches. Tactical approaches are bounded, localised and information led while strategic approaches bolster enabling environment for collective action, scale up citizen engagement beyond the local arena and attempt to bolster governmental capacity to respond to voice. Secondly, open data should be made in a way that it is accessible to a good number of citizens who can use the information to make demand on the government. It has been pointed out that in some cases, the most likely immediate beneficiaries of open data are those with the most resources to make effective use of data. Thirdly, it is important to point out that the responsiveness of the government to the use of data by citizens is crucial to make open governance meaningful. Scholars are in agreement that Open Government Initiatives should ensure that there are more processes and relationships focused endeavours that aim to transform governance systems and behaviours by opening them up to a wider range of participants contesting and reconfiguring power dynamics. In this regard, the responsiveness of government depends to a large extent on willingness and capacity. Fourthly, citizen participation can make all the difference in Open Government Partnership.
Technology is key to driving Open Government Partnership especially because it can help a lot in eliminating discretion and prevent corruption. But the use of technology must be carefully selected, planned and monitored. Studies have shown that technology for transparency and accountability tools do not necessarily have to be sophisticated to succeed but they need to be designed intelligently and with eye towards local content. It must be noted that while technologies may offer new opportunities for citizens to interrogate government data and information and to mobilise to demand accountability, let it not be forgotten that technologies can also be used to suppress accountability demands and violate human rights. As a matter of fact, one study showed that the Mexican government, co-chair of the Open Government Partnership from 2013-2015 used technologies to undermine its citizens’ attempt to challenge and hold it accountable for its actions. The Citizens have to struggle against increasingly sophisticated techniques of control and repression that successfully exploit the very mechanisms that many consider to be emancipatory technologies. This is why in choosing technology to adopt, it is important to examine the appropriateness for the intended users in the intended contexts.
EXAMPLE OF ACTIONS
As noted above, any country that joins the OGP is expected to produce action plans. There are examples of actions by other countries that Nigeria can learn from. For instance, Columbia’s action plan incorporated subnational level actions. Meanwhile, in 2015, the OGP Secretariat launched a subnational pilot programme designed to meet the objectives of fostering more diverse political leadership; holding governments accountable at local level; supporting subnational governments to become more open, accountable and responsive; promoting new and innovative open government technology and practice at subnational level; creating practical opportunities for subnational governments; supporting and empowering sunbational government reformers with technical expertise and inspiration and broadening and deepening participation of civil society in OGP. Finland committed to engaging Children and the elderly in the creation of public policies, making open government principles more democratic and inclusive. France committed to using data visualisations and applications to educate and raise awareness of climate challenges. Liberia’s plan outlined creative methods for transmitting information about budgets, open government and other issues through text messages, town criers, radio, interactive murals, and citizen journalism to ensure that critical information reaches every part of the country no matter the infrastructure challenges.
The Buhari administration made the commendable move of joining the Open Government Partnership (OGP), The partnership has the potential to unblock those challenges that have prevented the government from providing effective service delivery to citizens. The process of operationalising OGP in Nigeria has started. Nigeria government and citizens need to learn from the experiences of other countries and engage the process in a way that will lead to the accelerated development of Nigeria.
 Edwards, D and McGee, R (2016) (Eds), Opening Governance. IDS Bulletin Vol. 47, No. 1. 2016
 Carothers, T. and Brechenmacher, S. (2014), Accountability. Transparency, Participation and Inclusion: A New Development Consensus. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. http://carnegieendowment.org
 Edwards, D. and McGee, R (2016) Op Cit
 McGee, R and Gaventa, J. (2010), “Review of Impact and Effectiveness of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives: Synthesis Report” Prepared for the Transparency and Accountability Initiative Workshop, Institute of Development Studies, 14-15 October, 2010.
 Edwards, D and McGee, R (2016) Op Cit
 Trere, E (2016), The Dark Side of Digital Politics: Understanding the Algorithmic manufacturing of Consent and Hindering of On line Dissidence” in Edwards, D and McGee, R (Eds), IDS Bulletin, Vol 47, Vol 1, Jan 2016.
 2015 Annual Report Open Government Partnership