Is Nigeria's Membership in the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) the Cause of Religious Intolerance in Nigeria? A Reply to Reverend Alfred Adewale Martins

BY

Ibrahim Ahmed

Aibrahim542000@yahoo.com

 

 

A momentous event such as last week’s federal government proclamation of emergency rule in Plateau state is bound to trigger a wide range of reactions. While most reactions have followed the predictable pattern of either support for or denunciation of government’s action, few reactions have come across as thoroughly strange. Most Reverend Alfred Adewale Martins’ reaction belongs to the latter category. He was reported to have suggested in the online edition of the Daily Independent on Monday, May 24 2004, that Nigeria’s membership in the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is the cause of worsening religious intolerance in Nigeria. The Reverend’s assertion is strange because he did explain how. Yet it is not out of place to conclude that if indeed he is right, those who are opposed to Nigeria’s membership in the OIC are probably to blame for the worsening state of affairs between Muslims and Christians in Nigeria. This is the position I explain in what follows.

 

Nigeria joined the OIC in 1986 to the consternation of the Christian elites, who thought that Nigeria’s admission into the OIC was going to turn the country into an Islamic republic. The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) was formed as a direct consequence of that event to rally Nigerian Christians in protest against what they called the Islamization of Nigeria. Because of the motive behind the founding of CAN, it makes sense to ask what methods were adopted by that Association to achieve its objective of protesting Nigeria’s entry into the OIC. The blatant misrepresentation of the OIC and what it stands for, as evident in Dr Okogie’s assertion which appeared in the Guardian of February 23, 2000, demonstrates how deliberate misinformation or perhaps ignorance has fanned the ember of discord among Nigerian Christians and Muslims. Dr Olubunmi Okogie was the first president of CAN and he was the one who told the Guardian that OIC stands for Organisation of Islamic Countries and that introduction of Sharia in the North was part of the conditions for joining the OIC. Dr Okogie was speaking in February of 2000; fourteen years after Nigeria had joined the OIC.

 

 Before 1986, Nigerian Christian elites had opposed the inclusion of Sharia provision in the 1979 constitution in their relentless attitude of blackmailing their Muslim counterparts. It is their opposition to everything Islamic and the lies, provocations and deception they employ in achieving their objectives that has brought Muslim-Christian relations in Nigeria where it is today and not the OIC. The federal government under chief Obasanjo is not helping matters either. Federal appointments are too much in favour of Christians. Look at the finance ministry, where the top two political appointees are Christians; look at the Central Bank of Nigeria, where after Dr Joseph Sanusi’s retirement, the top two people there would be Christians. Professor Soludo who moves to the Central Bank is not replaced by a Muslim. Consider the pattern of replacing retiring Muslims with Christians but only Christians with Christians; look at the scores of born again Christians hired by Obasanjo as advisers and aides. Obasanjo seems to be saying that there are no competent Muslims to ensure a fair distribution of federal government jobs. How many Muslims from the Southwest zone are in his cabinet? The President could find a female Christian minister of state for finance from the North, but could not find more than 1 male Muslim junior minister from the southwest.  I cannot understand whether this is what Reverend Martins considers a level playing field. Where is that level playing field in federal government institutions such as the NTA? Since the days of Jerry Gana as the minister of information, the NTA has been turned into a Christian propaganda machine. 

 

For the umpteenth time, the OIC is a platform founded to promote the legitimate interests of Muslims everywhere in the world. This objective is not concomitant with injuring the interests of non-Muslims. The Charter of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference is very clear about this. In fact it is one platform the Nigerian government has failed to explore in its search for solutions to some of the socio-economic problems plaguing Nigeria. Concerning Nigeria’s economic difficulties, all we need to do as a member of the OIC is to express interest of membership in the Islamic Development Bank, an international financial institution founded by the OIC to promote economic development in member countries. Nigeria is the only country that is a member of the OIC but not a member of the IDB.

 

Professor Jerry Gana, the political adviser to president Obasanjo, who himself came into the limelight on the CAN platform is one of those bent on making sure that Nigeria does not reap the full benefits of our membership in the OIC. Only yesterday, 24/5/2004, on the NTA Network news, he was addressing a group of Christians, urging them to pray for Christians in government that they may work according to the Gospel! Jerry Gana knows that the IDB has been contributing to economic development in its member countries, among which are Cameroon, Cote d’ Ivore, Benin, Mozambique, Uganda, to mention a few. All these countries have substantial Christian populations, albeit peace-loving and tolerant Christians. While their Christian populations appreciate the wisdom of their governments for joining institutions like the IDB that grant interest-free loans, their countries have neither introduced the Sharia nor have they become Islamic republics.

 

It is not only the Muslim population of those African member countries of the IDB that reap the benefits of their countries’ membership in that organisation. The university hostels financed by the IDB in Ghana are not meant for Muslims students alone. Contributions made by Muslims in the field of sciences in the tenth century were the foundation upon which the European scientific revolution is based. The telephone, computers, internet invented in the West in the last century are used by Muslims all over the world today. This is the fact of life. The point here is that Christian and Muslims have to tolerate themselves in Nigeria to take that country out of the woods and that contributions made by either party lose their paternity the moment they start to yield benefits.  

 

 The gains accruable to Nigeria from our membership in the OIC and IDB are enormous and I believe we should explore those avenues. When President Olusegun Obasanjo and his Foreign Minister, Ambassador Olu Adeniji, visited the Islamic Republic of Iran, in February of this year, they came back with the positive impression of how Nigeria and Iran have a lot of things in common. President Obasanjo mentioned the Islamic culture. His Foreign Minister was amazed at how far Iran had gone in terms of development and how a stronger cooperation with Iran could be beneficial to Nigeria. The President was in Iran to attend the meeting of the D-8, Eight Developing Countries. All of those countries, including Nigeria, are members of the OIC. As a result of that visit an Iranian trade delegation headed by Dr Kamal Kharazi, the Iranian foreign minister, visited Nigeria to start discussions on investments. Of course such investments, like all other investments, do not carry the religious labels.  

 

This is not to say that Iran does not have diplomatic representations in Nigeria. Students of international relations will confirm that multilateral relations among countries sometimes produce better results than bilateral relations. That is why ECOWAS is not a substitute for our bilateral relations with the remaining 15 West African countries in that sub-regional group. What we can achieve working together with 56 OIC Member States, cannot be achieved working with each of them bilaterally. The same is true of the African Union and all regional and international organisations where we are members.

 

In conclusion, I implore Reverend Martins and other Christian to consider this submission deeply and to look inwards for the causes of heightened religious intolerance in Nigeria. Let him know that it was the visit of the now wanted Chief Anthony Ani to Saudi Arabia in 1994 as General Abacha’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs that gave birth to Christian Pilgrims Boards in Nigeria. Muslims did not begrudge our Christian brothers and sisters for wanting to rival the Muslim pilgrims Boards and for improvising pilgrimages to Jerusalem. In any event, it is the Organisation of the Islamic Conference which champions the cause of Palestine so that the inhuman treatments meted out to Nigerian Christian pilgrims to Jerusalem are discontinued. As human beings, Muslim and Christians, this is what we should be doing and Nigeria can do it better in the OIC.