Road to “State of Emergency

By

Abdulrazaque Bello-Barkindo

razbell73@hotmail.com

 

Without doubt our country is seriously divided on many issues. We are divided on Sharia, on capital punishment and on the safety and security of our fellow citizens. Yes, we may have ignored the reality because only our neighbours have fallen victim to robbers; and not us. But another kind of thief is now on the prowl. This one, with mere word of mouth, takes away our hard earned freedom of deciding where to live.

 

We are divided on that decision as well. When Governor Joshua Dariye rode his Trojan ego on the road to the “state of emergency”, not many predicted where it would land him. Like a drunken sailor, Dariye threw caution to the winds. Having spent more time in Britain lately than in Plateau State Dariye’s speeches became more Blairesque. Resplendent with anecdotes on Al Qaida and other such already discredited jargon that is dragging even the world’s most powerful people to the mud, there is little surprise that he fell faster than he imagined. The state became not Plateau, but a “state of emergency.”

 

Naturally, what followed was a concert of opinions on the president’s action. Imposing a state of emergency on the plateau, many argue, is wrong. But if it is wrong, what is right?

Not a single critic of the president has suggested any sensible alternative to the president’s panic action. We had on our hands a total collapse of law and order in a densely populated, multicultural and multi-religious region and a governor who cared less.

 

While in the past President Obasanjo had been exhorting the citizenry to be tolerant of one another and law abiding at all times, we fell into a ditch where the chief security officer of a state was holding court with utmost lack of moderation. It is wrong that Muslims are for- and Christians are against- the president’s action, because it sought to protect, they say, the interests of only Muslims, but how do they expect a father to intervene in a fight where five huge brothers of the same mother are lynching two skinny adopted children, all of the same family?  Without any hinge of remorse, I say that imposing a state of emergency in plateau was right, to the extent that moderation and enlightenment had taken flight and given way to extremism even within the corridors of state power.

 

If the governor himself had adopted these simple principles of moderation and enlightenment, we may have been reading a different story in our media. These are but words, but they carry great weight because they form the fulcrum of democracy. A moderate person avoids extremes and is temperate in conduct and expression especially when he occupies an important political position. An enlightened person is well-informed, knowledgeable and free from prejudice. Dariye is neither.

 

He made his bed, he is lying in it! Why should we sympathise with a governor who aimlessly groups some of his voters along with Al Qaida? It is a pity that every attempt to inculcate the virtues of tolerance and moderation in our body politic is not getting anywhere. It is even more disheartening that not just the madding crowd but an important segment of our political elite, especially those who derive their powers from a clumsy hand-in-glove favour with the religious elite now spearhead the violence and publicly display their intolerance towards others. Unless such people expunge their prejudices, the goal of attaining unity among Nigerians will remain a pipe dream.

 

We have seen in Bauchi how Rev Yakubu Pam was termed an idiot by President Obasanjo for his intolerance just as the JNI Secretary Abdulazeez Yusuf made a fool of himself by his utterances; asking Obasanjo if he really wanted to bring peace to the nation. Short of saying that the two religious leaders were playing to the gallery, they also consider the tenets of moderation and enlightenment an antithesis of their religious doctrines. These are people who should, without any prodding, help the nation achieve its much desired peace and unity. They might have in their preaching in the past paid lip-service to peaceful co-existence but on that day, they publicly showed that they were loose and misguided extremists. Their flocks were certainly without their herdsmen. And since they were recognised leaders of some kind, it becomes obvious why intolerance permeates the rungs and cadres of our society at all levels.

 

The question is what to do with such evil “men of God?” We must stop them! Since 1984 no one has dared to curb the excesses of religious leaders, Christian or Muslim. Their numbers are not only multiplying in geometric proportion, but their excesses are becoming more heinous. Worse still, they are being lapped up by successive governments for reasons that are more un-Godly than evil can be. The result of this is that just as Nigeria is struggling to develop its democracy, laws and actions that denigrate minorities and women are becoming more rampant in our societies. We are finding new names for the non-indigent, calling them settlers and migrants. We are also sentencing women to death by stoning, a thing that even Iran which has and omnipotent clergy has abolished and which Pakistan a totally Muslim country is trying to do. To my mind, any leader, political or religious who admonishes his people to retaliate or kill either for the well-being of their society or to find a short-cut to jannat does not belong in this day and age.

 

razaque