A Response to Ndubueze Godson’s Rejoinder to Tunde Adenobi's "Igbo: Dating Yoruba but Marrying Hausa/Fulani"

By

Dr. Sylvester Omosun Fadal

Moco_f@yahoo.com

Ignorance is sometimes equaled to non-significance and the rejoinder by Ndubueze does not only expose his retarded analytical skills and general character flaws but also, it shows his level of comprehension of intellectual discussion.  Ndubueze’s tendency to attack the character/person rather than the subject is an obvious indication of his failure to understand the rules of reasonable discussion, augmented by competent reasoning in effort to reach a valid conclusion and an acceptable/unacceptable finding.  To avoid condescending to his level of non-insight and non-intellectual brilliancy, I will not dissect his article and would rather apply a brief and finite response to shine the light on his weakness as indicated by the writing of an “oxymoron” who lacks the ability to establish a solid purpose statement, analyze, support, and validate the purpose statement with convincing evidence, in effort to conclusively reach an acceptable finding. 

In his argument, Ndubueze isolated the Yorubas from the Binis stating, “By the way have you read your history lately compliments (run-on words) of the most revered Omo N’Oba Erediauwa of Bini? Did Oduduwa land from heaven chained (ludicrous) or was he a runaway thief who escaped death in Bini to form what’s known as Yoruba?”  In this case, he separated the Binis from the Yorubas using Omo N’Oba Erediauwa of Benin as a resource. He unintelligently turned around and clustered the Yorubas and Binis in the same category by stating “Did you conveniently forgot (grammar usage) the overwhelming numbers (mixing singular and plural in the same sentence) of men from your tribe and countless Bini indigenes that served the Abacha led junta? Here are few (grammar usage) to get a handle, Lateef Jakande, Ebenezer Babatope, Sam Aluko, Ikimi, and the numerous Generals (Diya, Adisa, Olarewajun etc)” (logical reasoning issue). In defending an argument, it is unacceptable according to the rule of qualitative and/or quantitative research to flip flop variables.  Ndubueze ignorantly used the Binis in defending his point against the Yorubas and in the same vein used both the Bini and Yoruba variables in the same cluster when he deemed it okay to do so, in effort to make a flawed point.

Sometimes, it is best to restrain oneself from displaying a level of ignorance than to make a blanket accusation of a multitude of honorable professionals because ones weak sense of emotional maturity as displayed by Nwabueze's action overshadows his or her reasoning.  The good news however, is that most Nigerians were raised to recognized the importance of not isolating people by their ethnic links and as such, their love and relationship with the Igbos and all other Nigerians will remain unchanged.  My objective analysis of leadership in Nigeria will remain regardless of the relative attitude of a select few like Ndubueze.  There is no need to get personal as such attacks never gets the intended points across.  I hope Ndubueze will learn the rules of literary engagement and how it works best.  As much as I don’t know Tunde Adenobi, this response is not about a person but the purpose to encourage a dialogue of literary reasoning rather than temper-antic thinking.