A
House of Simpletons? ByEmmanuel Franklyne Ogbunwezeh
Protagoras,
the ancient Greek sophist was not alone when he crowned man the measure
of all things- Homo omnia mensura”. The Hebrew Psalmist too, shared this
pristine truth and vision in all its entirety. In the hallowed songs of
the 8th Psalm, he sang in praise of his God, while submitting
one of the most elevating religious anthropologies, ever put on paper.
The Psalmist after observing the heavens in awe, and all other works
fashioned by the creator; came upon man himself; bowing to the
incomprehensible mystery before him, he asked:
„What is man that you care for him”.., You made him little less than
a god, with honour and glory, You crowned him ” (Ps. 8). This
trend over flooded its Hebraic banks to irrigate the conceptual universe
of Christian writers. The good old St. Ireneus, one of the great early
Christian writers, in an attempt to better appreciate the position of
the Psalmist summarized these great standpoints in a few alliteratively
rhythmic words: “The glory of God is man fully
alive”. Jesus the Christ in the same spirit recognized and
gave full expression to the primary mission of God or Nature in its
immensity, as the welfare of man. To this end, he reminded all history
in the 10th chapter of the Gospel of St. John, the apostle of
love, saying; “I
came that they may have life and have it most abundantly” This
is to say, that Whoever made man crowned him with some integrity, honour
and a certain divinity, which he brings to bear on certain, if not all
dimensions of his social existence. To this end, any social structure
which conduces to the dehumanization of man, or any apparatus of state
that curtails or circumscribes man’s enjoyment of full existence and
welfare, in suffocating degradation is totally unacceptable. It is a sin
in religion. Philosophy abhors it. Ethics and logic view it as
diametrically untenable. The question then coagulates into a fossilized
currency: Why does some structure crafted for human welfare degenerate
in certain climes, to become instruments of human exploitative
denigration? A legislative instance would essay to clarify our meaning
here. Man
mirrors and epitomizes in himself, the summary of God or Nature, when he
sits in to legislate. He clothes himself in the apparel of the gods,
when he sits in on the tribunes of legislation to make laws for the
order and good government of his society. This construction is informed
by, and gains credence upon the fact that Nature is the greatest
lawmaker. In the pristine foundations of creation, nature installed a
refined medley of laws, which holds and sustains the universe in being.
Hence, our galaxy and every other galaxy in all the solar systems making
up the awesome immensity of our universe, know their defined path or
orbit; attends punctually to it, and cannot deviate there from. The
Waters know their levels and would not wish to deviate there from save
for man’s unsustainable exploitation of his environment. In the
subatomic universe, the atoms equally knew their groove and religiously
follow it. Physical laws bath and crisscross the universe even to the
furthest portals of its microcosmic ramifications. Laws like gravity,
laws of motion, uncertainty principle, etc are some of these physical
laws that forestall our universe imploding into a cosmic anarchy that
would spell the end of time, as we know it. Laws are ontologically
necessary for order and good governance of the universe. That is why
nature remains the first lawmaker. Every creature then took up this
metaphysical refrain. Laws guide our actions. When and where they seem
to be absent, we are compelled to either invent some, in consultation
with the reality surrounding us, or we open up ourselves to
self-destruction in an anarchic whirlpool of social irreconcilable
dissonance. Nature
as it holds and applies here is to be construed, though not too
strictly, in the Spinozian sense of God or Nature-“Deus
sive Natura“ This then introduces us to the lofty esteem in
which the art of law making is held in the metaphysical and religious
concourse of all cultures and creeds. In Greek and Roman Mythologies, Not
heeding the warning of the gods was Caesar’s first mistake. He could
have survived. The gods could still have helped him; save for the fact
that blinded by the pride of his achievements and greatness, he bore the
seat of the gods lightly. The conspirators wanted a code, as well as a
wooden justification for their impending crime. They needed a sign that
would signal and direct all their daggers of treachery simultaneously
into Caesar’s body, so that the synchronized blows will deal the great
Caesar some mortal injuries; spill his royal blood and wound him fatally
as to necessarily and decisively compromise his body’s ability to
support the fragile ligaments of his soul. They searched for a code as
well as a justification, but could not come upon any, until they asked
Caesar to repeal his banishment of Publius Cimber. In the feigned and
pretended patronage native to the treacherous countenance of most
proximately potential murderers, Cassius pleaded with Caesar to
reconsider a stance that was cast irrevocably in granite recalcitrance.
He being Caesar’s friend, more than any other person, knew that such
Caesarean stance couldn’t brook any reconsideration. Though Metelius
Cimber was the first to enter a plea for his brother before the great
Caesar, other conspirators joined in cosmetic courtesy, to plead for a
banished man, in the presence of a man they were primed to murder in a
few seconds. Caesar may have still received the patronage of the gods in
any imagined form, had he firmly and humbly dismissed their requests. He
did not. Rather to stamp the finality of his decision in the timorous
sands of their minds, he told them that he can only change his decision,
when they are able to earn the power and the divine effrontery, which
could safeguard them from the angry wraths of blasphemed and apostatized
gods of their world and on the same breath undertake an impossible
project. These impossible criteria for gaining Caesar’s
reconsideration of Cimber’s banishment, was summed up in those words
brimming with arrogance: “Hence wilt thou lift up But
today many Nigerian senators and MPs have committed worse crimes in
those hallowed sanctuaries of democracy, yet they are still walking the
streets, bearing their inglorious selves with a bloated air of
self-importance, which is simply emptiness and dishonour in motion. The
custodians of our laws have debased and rape our mandate. They have
committed a progressive range of unpardonable blasphemies against
justice, equity and good conscience. They have converted our democratic
symbols into instruments for the worship of avarice. They have borne the
people’s pain lightly, as their comprehensive looting of the national
weal has really essayed to crush the masses further into the mires and
quicksands of poverty and chill penury. Their abandonment of their
democratically assigned role has reconverted Caesar
was a great Roman. Most of these Nigerians MP’s in question are the
worst dregs of convoluted avarice and indefatigable selfishness. Caesar
made At
the birth of democracy, parliaments or House of laws, arose as the
hallowed sanctuaries representative of the people’s mandate. In these
sacred halls, the people’s mandate is deployed to craft legislations
that are naturally meant to conduce to the peace, order and good
government of the people. Since law making issues from the cores of
nature; and since God is the great law maker, whenever man steps to act
in his stead, that action becomes a sacred function and the place where
the action takes places, a sacred precinct. This is the metaphysical
base that makes the parliament a sacred sanctuary of the people’s
will. The founding Fathers of the That
is the glory, majesty and beauty of the legislature. It is a house built
for good sense, a citadel of service, the soul of government and the
engine of democracy. A parliament or legislature, according to John Pym “is
that to the Commonwealth which the soul is to the body”.
And for him, “It behoves us therefore to
keep the facility of that soul from distemper” This is the
spirit that holds and obtains in houses of legislature, in the course of
democratic evolution. The legislature under whatever name has in history
midwifed men of great intellect, incorruptible moral convictions and
impeccable integrity. A roll of honour for great men of learning and
character that have graced the glorious halls of various parliaments
across the world would see men like Demosthenes in But
all these lofty values came to The
myopia and poverty of ideas dominating our decision making bodies in
Nigeria are simply attributable to fact that as the sun was setting for
the military government in Nigeria, a network of crooked variables were
busy rigging themselves into positions from where they could impose
questionable characters to represent their avaricious blueprints on the
pretext of representing the people. It is only in the Nigerian house of
simpletons that millions of naira was scandalously mapped out for furniture
allowance, which fell under the very first major preoccupation
of the national assembly of a country where over 85% of the people are
summaries of poverty. Here the legislators embarked on a looting spree
of the national treasury under the smokescreens of furniture allowance.
The convulsively ugly nature of the amount mapped to that effect
juxtaposed with the chill penury afflicting the Nigerian masses then,
portrayed these lawmakers as scandalous vampires and mean spirited
parasites out to suck and bleed It
is only in Nigeria that a speaker of the house could spend 19 million
naira for a two day Salah celebrations, when his salary for one year is
not up to that amount and more so when the people whose mandate he
stole, cannot put two decent square meals on the table or afford some
pieces of meat for their own Salah celebration. Is it not only in Do
we need to go into sterile reminiscences of the corrupt tussle for power
in the senate, which saw Evans Enwerem being kicked out after some
months as the President; through to the Okadigbo who was too-independent
minded to be Obasanjo’s pliable plastercine; and finally to the Pius
Anyim whose active collusion completed the triumvirate of fraud, made up
of Obasanjo, Anyim and Na Abba that doctored and mutilated the Electoral
Act 2001, to the unfair and criminal advantage of the PDP? Do we need to
recount the contract scandals that embroiled the senate or the bribery
allegation scandal preferred against Nzeribe and Governor Odili
respectively during some of the OBJ’s impeachment saga? I
have resisted the temptation to state that Nigerian legislature at all
levels has been desecrated. It has been turned into a huge distribution
agency, where unfortunate characters sleep through legislative sessions
and are only awake in the backrooms where deals on contracts are cut.
One then begins to wonder, whether the people would for all intents and
purposes elect contractors to go and represent their interests at the
national level. The stench of corruption coming from those chambers at Our
“honourable” law makers ride in pleasure cars with tinted glasses,
which equally blind them from seeing the naked plight of these hapless
Nigerians, whom their legislative greed is helping to push further down
the poverty slope. Where the roads are impassable, the employ the
services of government funded Jeeps. This has further inoculated them
against any resolve to craft a comprehensive transportation policy or
law that would see to the development of a broad network of
transportation possibilities, like railways, inland waterway system,
airports and good well maintained roads network. If
these men consult their brains at all, they would have asked themselves,
what they have been able to do to rescue the Nigerian economy from its
unhealthy overdependence on oil and its consequent status as a
mono-product economy. This is a pertinent question, in an age when
countries like At
the state level, the assemblies have abandoned their watchdog positions
to become the rubber stamp of incompetent state governors as well as the
vendetta machines of irked State Chief executives. We can recount the
impeachment saga across the country’s legislatures and their local
government area counterparts. Today, Mr. Orji Uzor Kalu is pursuing his
deputy Mr. Chima Nwafor, with all the boiling, corrosive and murderous
venom of an enraged god. He is using the State legislature as his
vendetta machine in that regard. This is the second time that Mr. Kalu
is fighting to remove his deputy. The Kalu-controlled House of Assembly
successfully impeached the first, Mr. Abaribe. The political head of the
second Mr. Nwafor is now on the legislative slaughter slab, awaiting
political decapitation. I would not want to recount the Federally
supported attempt to unconstitutionally remove Ngige from office and the
inglorious role played by the Anambra State House of Assembly in the
Ngige-gate scandal. Taking
this detour is to enable me ask the most fundamental of questions as it
applies to the Nigerian situation: What has these legislators done to
help Nigerians and This
harrowing incompetence and dysfunctional inaction summarized in our
legislators apart from constituting an insult to the lofty principles of
democratic governance, seems to consolidate the politically pessimistic
views of Gore Vidal when he defined politics as made up of two words:
“Poli” which is Greek for “Many” and “tics”, which are blood
sucking insects. Our legislature seems to be the playground of many
blood sucking socio-political “Insects”. That is the only reason,
that the country they have been piloting is bringing the rear in the
world poverty index. I think that these men should be told in no clear terms that Nigerians have had enough of their tomfoolery. Their unprincipled vacillations and political directionless ness is really compromising our welfare and that of our posterity. The legislature is a House of laws and not a den of debauched thieves. Politics should be about ethics. Hiding under the slogan that politics is a dirty game to perpetrate their avaricious regimes is a tendency, which is unacceptable in the score of manners. Politics is only dirty for a man whose vision and prefabricated prejudice is gravitated by corruption. Politics is a human act. And all human acts are inspired by ethical considerations for them to be worth the while. Aristotle one of the greatest philosophers of all times was well aware of the fact, that politics and ethics are inseparable Siamese twins. One dies the death of debauchery when divorced from the other. He sought no better platform than his Nicomachean Ethics to announce to the world that Man is a political animal. To this end, our legislators should better sit up and be alive to their responsibilities or take an honourable bow out of the scene by handing in their resignations. Politics should have some philosophy, and should not be abandoned to the whims and caprices of avaricious and egocentric hedonism. Plato essayed in his Republic to bridge any conceptual chasm between politics and philosophy. Paraphrasing these thoughts many centuries later, Abraham, Lincoln opined that those who desire to rule men must arm themselves with the power that wisdom and knowledge gives. Philosophers should become Kings or Kings become philosophers. This Platonic insight has not lost its touch in our world of today. The Nigerian legislators should either get wedded to justice and selflessness which are the fundamental basics of ethics, which impregnates every responsible politicking or they should get out of there. The Nigerian people remain the ultimate sovereign and repositories of power. Our house of parliament should suffer no more desecrations at the hands of misfits and inglorious men. It should prove itself to be above a mere conglomeration of simpletons out to satisfy their yawning and unquenchable greed. We really need a new direction. I hope someone is listening. |