For
How Long Will The World’s Crude Oil Reserves Last ?
By
Sam
Ejike Okoye
samokoye@hotmail.com
This year
oil hit a record-high of over $40 a barrel, and Royal Dutch/Shell Group
reportedly downgraded its reserves by 4.5 billion barrels. While
consumers pay for perceived shortages at the pump, scientists and
economists struggle to reach a consensus over "proven oil
reserves," or how much oil one can realistically mine before
recovery costs outstrip profits. Economist Leonardo Maugeri of
Italian energy company Eni fired up the debate this May with an
essay in the
US
Science journal that accused the "oil doomsters" of
crying wolf. Chief among the pessimists is the Association for the
Study of Peak Oil, a group of European scientists who estimate that
maximum oil production around the globe will peak in 2008 as demand
rises from developing economies such as
China
. "If you squeezed all the oil in
Iraq
into a single bottle, you could fill four glasses, with the world
consuming one glass of oil each year," says physicist and ASPO
president Kjell Aleklett. "We've consumed nine bottles since oil
was discovered, and we have another 9 or 10 in the refrigerator. How
many more are there? Some say five or six, but we say three."
Others believe (rather unrealistically!), like Maugeri, that the number
of glasses is virtually limitless. John Felmy, chief economist at the American
Petroleum Institute, argues that peak oil-production estimates are
so far off that for all practical purposes we might as well act as if
oil will flow forever. "Ever since oil was first harvested in the
1800s, people have said we'd run out of the stuff," Felmy says. In
the 1880s a Standard Oil executive sold off shares in the company
out of fear that its reserves were close to drying up. The Club of
Rome, a non-profit global think tank, said in the 1970s that we'd
hit peak oil in 2003. It didn't happen. If there is an end to the
debate, advanced oil-recovery technologies will most likely find it. For
example, a new seismic survey technique sends sound waves of varying
frequencies
thousands of meters below ground. Microphones arrayed above ground
record the reflected signals, and computer software models a three
dimensional picture of possible oil hot spots or reserves. The surveys
have now added a fourth dimension, creating a time-lapse simulation of
fluid movements. Companies are also finding sophisticated ways to mine
more oil from existing wells. Flexible, coiled-tube drills that carve
out horizontal side paths are a marked improvement over conventional,
rigid drills that move only straight down. Using such technology,
companies hope to soon harvest 50 to 60 percent of oil from existing
wells, up from today's 35 percent. Biotechnology is also keeping the
black gold flowing.
University
of
Alberta
scientists are searching for micro organisms that could dilute viscous,
hard-to-recover oil and make it flow more freely. "Technology can
help push peak oil production further and further out," says Satish
Pai, vice president of Oilfield Technologies (which consults for Schlumberger
Limited) searching for micro organisms that could dilute viscous,
hard-to-recover oil and make it flow more freely. According to him,
“Technology can also help push peak oil production further and further
out," But only time will tell if it's enough. However, the bottom
line is that today, oil is not only an economic issue, it is an
important political matter of geopolitical dimensions. Non-OPEC
oil-producing countries are already nearing their peak production,
leaving most of the remaining reserves in the politically unstable
Middle East
. Increasing tensions between Islam and the West are likely to further
threaten the access of the advanced industrialized countries to cheap
crude oil. Consequently, the issue of oil reserves may in the end turn
out to be a moot point since its relevance will in the end be determined
by the political and technological ease of access as well as constraints
posed by the global requirement of nations to keep atmospheric pollution
from fossil oil burning to a minimum within a very tight limit. Indeed, because
of the imperatives of human survival, the use of fossil fuels may before
too long be abandoned altogether in favour of alternative non-
fossil
energy sources such as biomass (wood and agricultural waste),
nuclear, hydropower, solar, wind, ocean, hydrogen and geothermal -- the
so-called renewable energy sources. For oil producing developing
countries like
Nigeria
which depend heavily on crude oil exports as major source of its
national external revenues, the critical issue revolves around the need
of the advanced industrialized countries for continued easy access to
oil at relatively cheap but stable prices. So long as crude oil flows on
those terms, earnings from oil exports are safe. But in the real world a
lot of things could go wrong. With the Chinese economy growing at
unprecedented rates, their future oil demand is bound to be on the
increase. The oil production situation in Venezuela and Russia
consequent upon the travails of Russian Yokos oil company as well as the
uncertainties Mr Chavez’s presidency respectively, gives a lot of
nerves to the international oil market traders, while the continued
violence in Iraq would also add to further uncertainties in world oil
price stability which may continue its upward trend up to $50 a barrel
and possibly beyond. The crucial question then is how high can the oil
price go in its present upward spiral before the world economy is driven
into a severe depression? Put another way, how high would oil prices
have to rise before mining costs begin to outstrip profits? What is
evident, is that if the demand-supply equation of crude oil is not
rationalised soon, something is bound to give sooner than later.
Unfortunately, the problem is more political than economic .This means
that unless the global economic, political and social inequities and
injustices that fuel local and international conflicts are addressed
mostly by the privileged, rich powerful or strong , be they individuals
or nations, terrorism (local and/or global) which is the other face of
inequities/injustices committed by man/nation against his fellow
man/nation will be with mankind for a long time yet. Alas, as the
Iraq
war showed us, it is quite easy to win the relatively simple high
technology military assault but to win the peace is a completely
different ball game. What should be apparent by now is that there is an
inescapable nexus between
political,
social and economic justice on the one hand and national and even world
economic development and peace on the other. In this context, the
tensions in
Nigeria
’s oil producing Niger Delta would not have arisen if the Nigerian
political leaders would eschew selfish interests in favour of equity and
social justice. But alas, the oil dichotomy dilemma in the sharing of
Nigeria’s oil earnings is but part of a deeper political malaise
arising from selfishness and lack of a political will to face up to the
unavoidable issue of political restructuring of the huge polity called
Nigeria. It seems that Nigerian political leaders are only willing to
engage in meaningful dialogue only when the polity is driven to the
brink of disintegration. through their own neglect Indeed, the
unnecessary controversy of whether a national conference should be
sovereign or not is nothing but a cop out and a sign of insincerity of
our political leaders as all thinking Nigerians know that what is meant
is that the conclusions of any such conference must be inviolable and
must not be tampered with by the government of the day as has happened
too often in the past. The tragedy of the situation is that President
Obasanjo, who no doubt is sincere in his efforts to rescue
Nigeria
from the abyss rejected a golden opportunity to write his name in gold
in
Nigeria
’s history books. Indeed, if at the outset, he realised that his
regime, though civilian would only be transitional to real democracy,
and therefore instead of going after corruption as his number one
priority had faced first the outstanding chronic issue of political
restructuring of Nigeria, the stage would have been set for real
democracy to take root in Nigeria. But, as an igbo proverb has it,
before acquiring a sleeping mat, one must first secure a land or space
to place it on. Thus inasmuch as NEEDS may well be an excellent economic
reform program, in the end its effectiveness may be undermined if it is
going to rest on an unstable political infrastructure such as obtains in
Nigeria now.
At the end
of the day, whatever becomes of
Nigeria
politically, the issue of what happens when our crude oil runs out is
just as important and must be addressed. In this regard, whether
Nigeria
’s continued membership of OPEC is in the overall strategic national
interest needs to be re-examined. We must therefore explore carefully
whether the export constraints of OPEC would enable
Nigeria
to balance effectively a number of competing factors, such as world
demand and stability of oil prices, against our urgent need to finance
our extant development programs such as NEEDS. Whatever is the case, it
is clear that while the gravy train of petrodollars is still in motion,
Nigeria
must not only maximise and manage prudently income from its oil reserves
but must more importantly use its oil income to diversify and upgrade
its economy. It is hoped that the Presidency, the Energy Commission, the
Federal Ministry of Science and Technology, the National Assembly and
the NNPC will all rise up to this imminent challenge.
Sam
Okoye , a life fellow of the
Nigerian
Academy
of Science and retired professor of physics writes from
London
.
|