Zimbabwean
Farmers: What is
Kwara
State
up to? A Rejoinder to MOU with Zimbabwean Farmers
By
Hameed
Jibril
ajibrilo@yahoo.com.au
Zimbabwean Farmers: What is Kwara State up
to?
I have tried in the last couple of months to
understand what I saw as a new development in which
the Federal government and some states, in particular
Kwara State, were trying to do by relocating certain
Zimbabwean farmers that have been displaced by the
crisis in Zimbabwe. Recent media reports have however
forced one to raise the issue in a public forum and
see what Nigerians themselves think about it as I
noticed that no comments had yet been made.
Here is my little take on some of the related issues.
While I understand the economic rationale involved in
the exercise, I have to say that I am concerned and
even rather skeptical of the benefits that these so
called "pioneers" would afford the local farmers and
the primary industry they will supposedly be engaged
in, agriculture. One understands the need for our
local agricultural sector to be further developed both
with financial support and the application of modern
technology and all that comes with it, what I fail to
however comprehend is the role these private
Zimbabwean farmers have in this regard.
I do not want to sound like an "alarmist", but we all
continue to see what Zimbabwe has faced as a result of
this crisis. Large parts of rich arable land (some say
more than 75 percent) had been in the hands of the
settlers who had used the produce from the land to
become very wealthy. Coupled with this was the use of
the cheap local labour that Zimbabwean farmhands
provided for some of these farmers. The resultant
effect was when this land was eventually put up for redistribution
(you could argue whether nepotism and corruption played a part) and when
the settler farmers who had monopolized food production left, the
country was plunged into a serious food crisis.
It was possible to see that no transfer of farm
management expertise had been passed to the local
population. Television reports showed a local
population that was not any better of than "sweat
shop" workers in other developing countries. The
western media went on to portray the settler farmer as
the caring, hardworking "messiah" whose main concern
was providing food and a means of livelihood for the
farmhands, as if the farmer was almost on a
humanitarian mission rather than running a highly
lucrative business and these locals were ungrateful
people who couldn’t feed themselves if left alone. It
was very arrogant, patronizing and the sad thing was
some of these farmers did not even realize it. These
so called "pioneers", either as descendants of those
who had taken unfair advantage of countries such as
Zimbabwe or had been influenced by the South African
experience in the apartheid era had come to see the
local farmhands as merely that, farmhands. People that
could not be able to rise above their lot and could be
used. Are these the type of people we want owning rich
arable land in Nigeria.
The other issue is, and usually common with big
business is local political involvement. The concern
that these settler farmers would want to protect their
business interests in whatever way possible is not
unfounded and is to be expected. However, to what
extent is this possible involvement to be and how
disruptive it might be is an issue that we will really
have to address.
While one cannot generalize and I am sure that there
are good farmers from Zimbabwe who would want to give
something back for what they receive in this venture,
I however feel the governments of these states and the
Federal government should take a more cautious
approach in inviting these farmers in. Yes, we need
foreign investment in that sector and transfer of
technology but if we are to invite people in, it
should be on our own terms and in a manner that would
benefit our local farmers from partnerships, joint
ventures and other knowledge/expertise sharing
participations. The authorities in these states and
the Federal Government should outline what concrete
benefits that are to be achieved, especially by local
farmers, and a proposed timeline for their
achievements. We all want what is best for Nigeria and
her economy to which agriculture remains vital. We
should however, as some say, "pedal it soft" and not
readily give away to foreign private enterprise that
black earth that would be a source of life for many
generations of Nigerians to come.
|