The Immunity Shroud
By
Eric Ula-Lisa
ulalisa@hotmail.com
If the
Metropolitan Police at the Heathrow airport saw a gun-man ran amok killing
and hacking down persons in his path, they would immediately arrest this
person and try him. If they had information that this person was a
governor in some African country, they would still arrest him. If you
doubt it, let any so-called Governor-General try it. Post 9/11 there has
been laws in all collaborating countries about cash transactions. If you
are an international traveler carrying more than a certain amount, the
security agencies of the world are interested in your business and source
of income and you would be under scrutiny whether you are aware of it or
not.
Airport Cash Declaration.
Every accused person is entitled to his counsel but when the good Oditah,
Q.C. regarding the questioning of the Bayelsa Governor says "Indeed, there
is no requirement in the UK to declare any cash brought in or taken out of
that country," one wonders if he has been following international security
trends since some terrorist turned our lives around.
If the Q.C. wants to test my theory, all he needs do is to buy a one way
ticket to any place in the western hemisphere and he would find the
scrutiny of the police dogging him. Further the Q.C should pay cash for
the ticket. Further still, if the Q.C. would withdraw from any bank
$100,000 cash and take same to any airport, he would encounter the same
scrutiny on entering any western country. The issue of chicanery,
nepotism, and political brinkmanship and facing the challenging task of
nation building in Nigeria, would not be considered when the Q.C. is
searched.
Diplomatic Immunity?
Oditah, Q.C. on behalf of his client is reported to have expressed the
hope that the British government will respect international conventions as
well as local legislation on diplomatic and sovereign immunity and
proceeds of crime, and desist from meddling in what he termed "a wholly
Nigerian political affair." We hope that the cash found on the person and
in the London home (as a side bar, it in the public interest to reveal
when the London home was bought) and we hope also that the home was not
bought with the “proceeds of crime”. We are wary of the good governor
carrying one million Pounds Sterling cash in a non-cash economy in
England. We hope all the solicitors and Barristers that have lined up to
defend the sovereign–immunity of the governor, can tell him that he has a
right to convert all the Federal allocation of Bayelsa State to his
account because he is fighting derivation wars. We beg to differ.
New International
Legal Outlook
Professor Sagay was also reported to have said Alamieyeseigha has the same
immunity against prosecution that the President of Nigeria enjoys under
Nigerian and British laws. Nwabueze is also reported to have supported
this, saying Alamieyeseigha enjoys immunity from prosecution under local
and international laws. The old theory of the law may be true for
Presidents, which Alamieyeseigha is not, but the new international reality
of terrorism and money laundering has shifted even that protection.
International finance is scrutinized across international borders and cash
transactions are presumed illegal source of laundering of drug money and
terrorism monies across boundaries until proved otherwise.
Cash Transactions
Every government, including the most primitive of all, has access to bank
transfers and international electronic transfer. In the age of the
internet and credit card, persons who count hard currency in the millions
have access to all forms of transfer. That is why cash transactions of
thousands and millions in the modern economies are not only primitive but
presumed by the advanced economies as an attempt to evade tracing. If your
transaction is above board why would you be reluctant to leave a paper
trail is the logical question asked by security agents. There is a
presumption that if you are smart enough to make up to $10,000
legitimately in the international economy, you would know the rules of
credit besides the inconvenience of counting physical cash. A government
of a state has many bank accounts and any transaction can be made by
transfer. Hardly any business carries one million pounds sterling in cash.
If the governor or even President of any country is caught red-handed with
cash suspected to be proceeds of terrorism or drugs or money laundering in
respect thereto, it would not matter if he pleads immunity to high
heavens. This in the new International legal regime post 9/11. Get used to
it.
We await November 15 to see that the governor has his day in court. For
now, he is presumed innocent until proved otherwise.
|