Census: I Wasn’t Counted, I Don’t Care

By

Philip Ikita

ikitap@yahoo.com

 
Ab-initio, I have increasingly remained apathetic towards the on-going headcount by the National Population Commission (NPC). This is due to the apparent extreme lack of commitment and hypocrisy of the Government of Nigeria.  Nigeria is one funny country that is full of contradictions, pretensions and hypocrisy. No class or category of Nigerians dramatizes these unfortunate traits than the ruling elite, particularly those that are in government at any given time, or are not in government but hope to get into I-chop-you-chop positions of government in Nigeria. ‘Government’ in Nigeria, at all levels, has consistently failed to face reality and often chooses to be hypocritical in serious matters that are very fundamental to Nigeria’s development and progress as a nation. Idiotic contradictions played out all through our government’s quest to carry out a population census. And as we await the results, I cannot but pity all the principal players in the census. The outcome will definitely anger not a few Nigerians.
 
Plans for the head count earlier planned for November 2005 clearly showed our government’s “seriousness” to conducting a head count. The “less serious” development partners, particularly the EU, funded more than half the cost of the census, providing huge technical support only for the less than committed Government of Nigeria (GON) to suddenly, a couple of months to November 2005, announce a cancellation due to lack of “funds” to match that of the development partners. So GON is too poor to afford a census after every ten years? A sovereign GON, with all the oil wealth at its disposal has to wait for foreign development partners to goad them to organize a census? How unserious could a government be! If not for development partners like the EU, the present government would never organize any census because it is not the priority of those in power.
 
Another issue that shows the lack of seriousness of GON is the hypocrisy in avoiding some very important data like ethnicity and religion. GON insists these are volatile data that could “threaten” the unity of Nigeria. Religion for instance, is a deep cultural factor within and among its adherents, it reflects on the economy and on other social factors like health and education, and our rulers tell us we do not need to know the number of Muslims, or Christians, or Traditional African Worshippers in Nigeria? Yet, even five and six-year old children seeking enrolment into public schools are required to state their religion and ethnic group! Public hospital cards have fields requiring religion and ethnic group which must be filled by all patients.  Educational institutions require both data (religion and ethnicity) in all applications. So do all applications into public jobs. When it comes to census, this vital statistics become “volatile” issues. Why this contradiction?
 
The next issue is the perception of census as a political exercise. Forget the preachments and “patriotic” talk by our rulers who urged citizens to remain and be counted wherever they reside in Nigeria. These patriotic preachers lied on this one, and they know that they lied and always lie on this. For instance, why should Emeka, an Abia State indigene residing in Kano swell the numbers of Kano for Kano State to get more federal allocation, when the same Abia indigene will be discriminated against in terms of employment, and his children asked to pay higher school fees in Kano public schools? Why should Emeka swell the numbers for Kano State to get more federal electoral constituencies and local governments, where he would only be allowed to “vote” for Kano indigenes, but never be voted for in an election in Kano? Our rulers know this is what happens! And they make it happen by emphasizing “indigeneship” above “residency”. Save for the empty patriotic talk by charlatans in government, GON has not done anything practical to convince that Nigerians are not “settlers” outside their state origin.
The Nigerian constitution in Chapter 3, dwelling on citizenship, aptly supports this anachronism called “indigeneship”. Our ruling elite know what they gain from this constitutional provision.
 
What about the talk by our rulers that multiple counting is fruitless because hi-tech machines will take only one fingerprint and reject the next similar fingerprints? This is very possible and this technology is used in many countries to ensure a near 100 % accurate database of all citizens. This database can be used for so many purposes from providing social security stipends to the unemployed, to voting during elections, to identifying criminals among other useful purposes. But that could work only in other countries. Since no two fingerprints are the same, it would mean that where every unemployed citizen can, individually collect social security stipend, how would our rulers lie and collect “poverty alleviation” on “behalf” of “thousands of unemployed citizens in their constituency”?  Are our rulers ready to adopt a working citizens’ database that will check election rigging? (Plans by Abel Guobadia of INEC to establish laminated voters cards with photos and fingerprints were frustrated by our rulers in 2002).
 
Is it for census that the GON now knows the importance of fingerprint identification? Why are they reluctant to adopt the technology for election purposes?  Why has the national ID card project gone into oblivion? The truth is that, our thieving rulers are averse to accurate figures and a functional citizen database. Most of our government institutions, the military, the police, the civil service etc. cannot provide even a near accurate figure of its men or employees. The reason is because the rulers thieve out of ghost workers. Every six months, they do a staff audit and expose ghost workers, they announce it gleefully in the media as if they are serious, ask them to create a data-base and they develop cold feet: it will stop them from chopping.  The noise about fingerprint technology by GON is big hypocrisy because they have rejected or frustrated the same technology where it mattered most for Nigeria’s progress and development.
 
Yet another issue that chronicles the contradictions of our census exercise is the employment of ad-hoc staff. It is common knowledge that the best workers achieve the best results. Not so with NPC. The first shock came when I read a newspaper report early March, telling of how lecturers, who applied to be census ad-hoc workers from the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ife, were astonished to find political jobbers on the list of successful applicants. None of the lecturers was employed! My shock stemmed from the fact that OAU is one university reputed for the study of demography in Nigeria. Across the country, so many undergraduates and National Youth Service Corp (NYSC) members, best suited to do the work were trained, dumped and replaced with a list of caricature workers supplied by local government council officials, local PDP bigwigs and traditional rulers!  Then the biggest shocker was to come, that ad-hoc staff collect training allowances and eloped in some states? Even when these workers were billed to each collect an amount of money three times the training allowance after the five-day counting exercise? How could such a large number of ad-hoc staff suffer and train for over a week (two weeks in some cases), collect five thousand naira, and then forgo the opportunity of working for five days and earn three times that amount? Did NPC officials play a fast one here? I am not a crime detector, but I find this hard to believe. Such are the unbelievable wonders that could only happen in our country, and nobody will be held responsible, no questions will be asked.
 
Because of the hypocrisy and lack of seriousness shown by Nigeria’s rulers, my apathy and disinterest for this otherwise important national exercise grew with the passing of each day. How was I omitted from the head count? On Sunday, March 19, I traveled to Yola, Adamawa State from my Abuja residence to visit a close family member who was ill. Tuesday, March 21, enumerators came to just number the house in which I stayed in Yola, promising to return the next day for actual enumeration of inhabitants. They never returned until I left Yola for Abuja on Sunday, March 26. When I arrived at my house in Abuja afternoon of the same day, I was told by my neighbors that enumerators had just counted them and left about an hour earlier. On Monday, March 27, the last day of counting (owing to the two-day extension by government), enumerators counted the security guards in the gatehouse to the compound that houses my office in Maitama District of Abuja.  I was inside the office, but I only learned of their coming on the next day, after the counting had ended. I would have, without resistance provided NPC enumerators with any information they required, only if the came to meet me, but owing to my apathy and disinterest, I refused to go find any enumerator to count me. Yes, I am one of those Nigerians that were not counted. It may not make any difference, but I don’t care.
 
Ikita, a Sociologist and Development Worker, lives in Abuja