Is The Cookie Really Crumbling? Sokoto Politics And Dilemma Of Misinformed Analysis

By

Gatawa M. Bagobiri

gatawa2007@yahoo.com

Explaining the complex political developments in Sokoto State has not been all that easy. It is an enterprise that requires sound understanding not only of the State political history but its geography, culture and political sociology. For one to make intelligent analysis of Sokoto State politics, knowledge of group dynamics, social relations, political behaviour and political culture is essential. Mastery of all these may make political analysis on Sokoto State less cumbersome. On the contrary, ignorance of these factors or reliance of hearsay and misguided utterances propagated by politicians with a view to winning sympathy and supporters will surely deter one (no matter how educated one is) from offering a meaningful insights on the current and future trends in Sokoto politics.

 
For instance, so sooner was Democratic Transition Programme unveiled in 1998, a section of the State elite relied on such layman’s facts and roadside stories to predict that the present Sokoto State Governor, Alhaji Attahiru Dalhatu Bafarawa, would be defeated if he dared contest the 1999 gubernatorial election. For employing wrong tools in making their analysis then, such a group was humiliated by the outcome of the 1999 gubernatorial election. Though at a lesser degree, similar wrong tools were used in predicting who was to win the 2003 gubernatorial election.
 
As similar elections are to be conducted early next year, the political analysts seem not to learn any lesson or show some sign of improvement in their mastery of predicting the shape of things to come regarding the politics and political behaviour in the State. Our expectation is that as professional and exposed as they are with the pattern of our democracy, the elite would this time employ relevant tools to guide their political analysis. Contrary to this, they have started using the old, outdated and unscientific methods of analysis, not minding that times without number such approaches had only led them into arriving at wrong conclusions.
 
For instance, a commentator and one of the contributing member in the lively Sokoto Political Discourse, has observed that as far as current and future Sokoto State political development is concerned, all he could see and predict is the “Crumbling of the Cookie” and that the whole game revolves round the combined forces of the newly registered Party, “DPP, Bafarawa’s incumbency and its consequent emasculation” effect on the Sokoto citizens. Such charges as the use of Executive machinery to propagate and drag civil servants and traditional rulers into the new party, the religious polarization of the State by the State Executives and use of state resources for party politics are all but an indication of how the elite have derailed from offering an objective political analysis of the State.
 
How could an analyst, who admits visiting the state periodically, claims to provide an insightful, balanced and biased-free analysis of such a complex issue as Sokoto State politics? It is surprising reading an elitist writing on websites and newspapers equating littering posters with popularity and acceptance in our current political dispensation. Only outside analysts who are not in touch with realities as they relate to politics and political behaviour among Nigerians in Nigeria can make such a analytical blunder. Consider also, the assertion that one sign showing that the “cookie was crumbling” was the political rally in Tambawal by one of the political party fiercely in competition with Bafarawa’s new party.
 
In all, realizing the subjective contents of his/her political analysis of Sokoto State politics and having openly declared his/her support for one of the political parties competing for control of power in the state, the commentator knows, as we all know, that his/her analysis lacks objectivity and might be thrown into dust bin by those wishing to enrich their understanding of Sokoto politics. This attitude of such analysts is beginning to make citizens doubt the ability of provide necessary insights of the shape of things to come 2007. As at now, most of the analyses offered on the subject provide no deeper insights than mere assembling of roadside stories for publication. For sure, that’s explains why such analyses expect “to draw harsh rejoinders” over their unsystematic approaches.
 
In this Forum we have said it times without number that the elite owe it a duty to provide necessary leadership to our teeming electorates and masses. As the 2007 general elections draw nearer, the elite are expected to undertake the task of educating and enlightening the masses. Where the elite fail in this sense the masses will in turn begin to loose confidence in them. No wonder, the status and respect accorded elite by the masses is fast withering out. Are the masses to blame? No. The blame squarely rests with the elite who seem to lack principles, objectivity and necessary exposure to enable them meet the societal expectations.
 
This apart, I appreciate the contributions of all analysts (objective or biased) on Sokoto Political Discourse. As issues are debated and analysed, the more interesting the Discourse becomes. On the contrary, the more individuals are debated and analysed, the more the discourse looses relevance and sense of direction. Our ‘self-exile’ brothers and sisters (and those that opted to confine themselves within the geographical boundary of Nigeria) should kindly take note of this.
 
Hmm, Sakkwatawa ho!
 
Lon live Sokoto State!
 
GATAWA M. BAGOBIRI,
SABON BIRNI LGA,
SOKOTO STATE