Will Ogebe And His Crew Fire Yar' Adua

By

Anthony Okosun

tonyosun@yahoo.co.uk

The elections held in Nigeria on April 21, 2007 were blemished and deeply screwed up.  Nigerian politicians however, very carefully and maturedly handled the post election crisis. They avoided the danger of allowing the current flawed elections issue to get out of hand. The refused to play into the hands of politicians in uniform. All the differences have so far been subjected to review within the confines of the law. No politician has detoured to extra legal nor extra judicial solutions.

The whole world was deeply disturbed by the depth of the rigging, the ill-preparedness, deliberate subvertion and most curiously and oddly the choice of the two main presidential candidates to participate in the elections, as the mother of all rigged elections did not spring any surprise on the any of the contestants. The former president Olusegun Obasanjo made it clear on several occasions, that the elections would be by all means.

Before the presidential elections were conducted, there was great maelstrom, turmoil and tumult over the conduct and the massive irregularities that flawed the governorship elections. The Domestic Election Observation Group, a collection of Nigerian monitoring organisations called for the elections to be annulled. The European Union's chief Observer Max Van Dern Berg declared "The process could not have been credible" Even the U. S.. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack had this to say "These were flawed elections, in some cases deeply flawed elections".

Nigerians must recognise the maturity demonstrated so far by all parties to this saga, who at all times showed much love for their fatherland, by not turning themselves into busy bodies and overheating the Nigerian polity, which could have annihilated our nascent democracy, and possibly turned Nigeria into another Lebanon, Iraq, Sudan or Yugoslavia. Though, the opposition claim, they were robbed at the polls, yet they juxtaposed their call for justice and fairness with the need to preserve and nurture the Nigerian political project. The two major contenders aside from the alleged winning candidate, had the opportunity to observe the depth of rigging and collateral irregularities that bedevilled the governorship elections and still believed in the integrity and bona fide avowal of the Nigerian judiciary to conduct a free and fair judicial review of the presidential elections, should a review become necessary. Thus it is now germane, apropos and kosher for all judicial and quasi-judicial bodies reviewing these flawed elections to properly utilise the profound opportunity offered through the instrumentality of judicial review to impartially and with the fear of God, do justice and equity in all the matters brought before them, especially, the presidential elections.

Though, the fixed and variable factors that propel candidates to victory in elections, all favoured the candidate Umar Yar' Adua. He was sponsored by the most sophisticated and most formidable party machinery. The PDP machine is a behemoth whose massive tentacles spread throughout the nooks and crannies in every unit across all the local government areas in Nigeria. By virtue of the fact that he was sponsored by the incumbent ruling party he had the largest financial resource to oil his campaign and execute his strategies. He had the best reputation among the major three candidates, before the elections. He was relatively unknown. Just as we did not know the good things he did as governor of Katsina state, we equally did not know of his minuses neither. Before the elections he was generally perceived as God fearing, disciplined, humble , loyal, peaceful, gentle, well -educated, well-bred, incorrupti ble ex-marxist - leninist. However, despite all the hereinbefore, listed good points, in President Yar Adua's  favour, the fact remains that if the if the elections were rigged, they were rigged.

It is my sincere belief, that because of the fact that we have all had a taste of the military. Nobody is desirous of a throw back to the Abacha years . All the fighting is been done in a highly civilise manner. The Election Tribunals and the Superior Courts have been the theatre of conflict resolution. INEC and the Presidency must respect all rulings, judgments and orders. Where fresh elections are recommended or ordered, INEC must comply immediately.The long suffering, impoverished, good and peace loving people of Nigeria do not want an ominous cloud of fear of coup or civil war hanging over their heads. President Umar Yar Adua and others in government, including all political leaders should work assiduously with determination and passion to diffuse any tension in the land and ensure that no enabling environment and atmosphere is created for those who would want to derail Nigeria's democracy through the instrumentality of force and coercion.

Justice Ogebe's very good reputation goes even much further and farther before him. The good judge and his crew, must use this historical opportunity offered by the instrumentality of Judicial review to establish a good, solid and long lasting foundation for Nigeria's democracy. Judicial Review was first adumberated by a former American Chief Justice, John Marshal in the globally celebrated case of Marbury V Madison. In that case the United States Supreme Court struck down an Act of the United States Congress, for being inconsistent with the United States Constitution.

Alexander Hamilton a reverred American lawyer and political Philosopher in his efforts to persuade the people of New York to ratify the United States Constitution wrote "There is no position  which depends on clearer principles,than that every act of a delegated authority,contrary to the tenor of the commissioner under which it is exercised is void.No legislative act[executive],therefore contrary to the constitution can be valid..To deny this,would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal."


Nigeria Executive branch of government under the leadership of President Olusegun Obasanjo constituted the Independent National Electoral Commission. The commission conducted a presidentia elections which was challenged and is now ripe for judgment before the Justice Ogebe Election Tribunal.  

All the gladiators went to the judiciary as the temple and last bastion of hope and justice. Ideally the judiciary is a repository of  wisdom,understanding and insight.The ball is now where it should be.. The gladiators have decided to act within the norms of civilisation and decency. They have chosen not to take the laws into their hands but to seek legal redress. Nigerians and indeed the whole world must be interested in this legal combat and the up coming decision therefof.

Considering the unfolding scenario from Alexander Hamilton's perspective, the Executive branch of the Federal tier of Government is an Agent,Operator,Executor or Worker of the people of Nigeria. The law of Agency is concerned with any Principal- Agent relationship. A relationship in which one person has legal authority to act for another. The law of Agency is based on the Latin Maxim QUI FACIT PER ALIUM,FACIT PER SE.Which means, He who acts through another is deemed in law to do it himself. An Agent cannot be greater than his Principal or Headmaster. An Agent can only exercise the powers delegated to him by the Principal. An Agent is answerable to his Principal or Headmaster. An Agent cannot exercise powers that he has not received from his Principal.

In the instant case the Judicial branch of Nigeria's Federal tier of Government represent and symbolises the Principal status of the Nigerian people. It is now judgment day. The day of reckoning is here. Did the Agent (Executive branch of government operating as INEC abused the powers delegated to him by the Principal (the People)? Did the Agent performed within his lawful and or constitutional powers? Did the Agent performed  BONA FIDE meaning in good faith.  Government is a Social Contract. The Social Contract theory  says those who govern receives the power and authority to govern from the people.

Those who are governed, voluntarily submits and yields themselves to the overriding authority of an institution, they have willingly created for convenience to help run their collective affairs,based on the Constitution,not the whims and caprice of any man. The government (INEC) must be pliable and malleable to the desires of the people. The Social Contract theory explains the justification and purpose of the state and of Human Rights. According to Hobbes theory the essence of Social Contract is that without organised government we would live in a state of nature,where we each have unlimited natural freedoms.The inhrent problem with this totally autonomous state is that it includes the right to do whatever one wants to do and thus grants the freedom to harm all or any who threaten one's self preservation.It would be a state of BELLUM OMNIUM CONTRA OMNES(war of all against all). To avoid this we unanimously agree to enter a Social Contract to acquire civil rights for accepting the obligation to honour the rights of others,giving up some freedom in the process. The authority or body we create to to represent our joint interest,to whom we delegate our powers is the Government or State.Thus, the State is an Agent while WE THE PEOPLE are the Principal. The rules and provisions of this sacred, profound and noble contract are enshrined in a document known as the Constitution. 

 It is the sacred duty of the Judiciary to interpret the constitution, and to protect the inviolability and time honoured sanctity of the constitution.  The Constitution is sacred and its sanctity must be honoured by all. The polity thrives in crisis and the constitution brings order to that crisis.  It is also the profound jurisdiction and domain of the judiciary to review every action of the State as an Agent of the Principal, that is ,the People ,based on the principles enshrined in the  Vade Mecum, that is the Constitution. In this regard, the Nigerian people look up to Justice Ogebe and his crew and they must not be found wanting.
 

Justice and his brothers in the Election Tribunal are people of  honour and integrity, and as much as it is tempting to address, the subject matter of  globally awaited landmark judgment on it's merit, I know, I cannot do that as the matter is effectively subjudiced. However, it is within my civil jurisdiction as a humble Nigerian to air my neutral and patriotric opinion and remind the tribunal as a cyber amicus curiae of  the duty of fairness that they owe to all Nigerians. The doctrine of Appearance of Fairness seek to promote the elimination of actual bias, prejudice, improper influence or favoritism, but also in the curbing of conditions which by their very existence, tend to create suspicion, generate misinterpretation, and cast a pall of partiality, impropriety, conflict of interest or prejudgment over the proceedings to which the relate.