Still On The Media, National
Security: The Inspector General Of Police,
Et.al.
By
Emeka Oraetoka
oramekllis@lycos.com
Media, Threat To
Democracy-Senator Smart Adeyemi, Former President of
the Nigerian Union of Journalists [NUJ], National Mirror, Friday,
October 10, 2008.
It must be said that one of the most
dangerous threats to our democracy today is the pattern of ownership
of information dissemination outfits in Nigeria . A checklist of
print media in Nigeria revealed that the publishers of these outfits
are ex-executive office holders, incumbents, and billionaire
businessmen; with their burning political ambitions. These print
outfits now serve as media to market their ambitions and pull down
real or perceived obstacles to their goals, in the name of serving
as the voice of the voiceless, watch dogs and so on. Although it
must be understood that there is nothing wrong with our print
outfits genuinely serving as voice of the voiceless and so on, a
situation whereby only the political publishers’ interest and voices
are heard, in most Nigeria print outfits is a threat to national
security and cohesion.
Senator Smart Adeyemi, former
President of the Nigerian Union of Journalists [NUJ] who can be
regarded as an authority in journalism and media ownership,
according to National Mirror of Friday October 10, 2008, said that
the greatest threat to our Nation is the media. According to him,
those who are establishing media houses today are members of the
ruling class who do not have the interest of the people at heart.
Further, Senator Adeyemi said “the interest” of most media owners
“is the money, the power, the economic benefit of setting up a media
house and the political influence. And because they don’t care about
the welfare of Nigerian journalists, who live in poverty, they [the
journalists] live in corruption. It is the greatest threat to the
stability of this country”---.Adeyemi’s position on media ownership
in Nigeria has clearly shown that we are in for a hard time as far
as objective information dissemination for national security is
concerned in Nigeria today.
In my last piece, attempt was made in
showing how subversive reports by mostly those print outfits owned
by these desperate “politician publishers”, jostling for their
political interest in the name of loyalty to the public, were
planted in the newspapers and some foreign based internet
information dissemination outfits. With the alarm raised by the
Peoples Democratic Party (P.D.P), some week’s back, that some
elements are planning to destabilize the country; the argument of
subversion of the State by some print establishments can no longer
exist only in this writer’s imagination. Though the allegation by P
D P has been challenged by people and equally dismissed by them as
ranting, the vital question remains, is the print media serving the
interest of Nigeria or that of their publishers?
The sustained report in some media
outfits of the planned retirement of the Inspector General of
Police, Sir Mike Mbama Okiro, and the issue of who replaces him,
suggests not only sustained blackmail of the President and
Commander- in- Chief of the Armed Forces, Umar Musa Yar’Adua into
appointing the officer being packaged by them, but a clear attempt
at usurping the function of Mr. President as the Chief Security
Officer of Nigeria. It is a settled fact that the fundamental
function of the President is maintenance of security and peace in
the country; therefore, the appointment of Mike Okiro as the
Inspector General of Police is first and foremost, based on Mr.
President’s belief as the Chief Security Officer of Nigeria, as well
as the Commander- In -Chief of the Armed Forces, that Okiro best
fits into his vision of effective internal security of Nigeria,
simpliciter. The suggestion in The Guardian of Sunday, March 22,
2009, page 6, where a certain agitated Igbo man dismissed the
confirmation of Okiro as Inspector General of Police, as a the
“triumph of 2007 politics of management of the Niger Delta people
over due process in the police service”, is not only suggestive of
blackmail but a sure attempt at questioning the President’s
integrity, and a clear encroachment into his security function. This
is the terrible extent the marketing of DIG Onovo as the next IGP by
his promoters has gone.
In-fact the hypocrisy of the cover
story of The Guardian in question above titled: Anxiety in
South/East Over DIG Onovo’s Fate could be cleverly masked by
discerning minds, by the realization that Mike Mbama Okiro, is an
Igbo man from Rivers State, just as Onovo is equally an Igbo from
Enugu State. Even the assertion that South/South geographical zone
has produced 3 Inspectors General of Police since the inception
of Nigeria, is misleading for the mere fact that when Etim Iyang
and Louis Edet were IGP, there was nothing like South/South as a
geo-political zone; what we had then was South/East region. The so
called agitated Igbo over the appointment of Okiro ahead of Onovo,
according to The Guardian report is hereby reminded that the current
Chairman or President General of Ohaneze Ndi-Igbo is from the same
South /South zone. Possibly, he [the agitated Igbo] could shed more
light on why Ralph Uwechue, instead of a man from South/East was
made the President of Ohaneze Ndi Igbo. Although, the mind-set of
the people of South/East to Policing as a job could be responsible
for core Igbo man’s absence in the role call of IGP’s before Mike
Okiro. For instance, Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe in his book, MY ODYSSEY,
related how his mother had to travel all the way to Ghana from
Onitsha , to intimate him of the displeasure of the entire family
over his decision to join the Police.
For one month running the Guardian
newspaper has been defending “Igbo cause” as could be seen from its
report on DIG Onovo and the “injustices” meted out to him and so on.
This laudable “effort” by The Guardian should have been extended to
Igbos in Delta, Rivers and so on. After all, the Igbo are the same
everywhere. To single out Onovo as Igbo man, Okiro, as probably an
Ibibio or Urhobo man, is to say the least, mischievous and
subversive, or so it appears to me. Taking the stampeding and
blackmailing of President Yar-Adua, further, one Felix Oguejiofor
Abugu, wrote in the same Guardian of Saturday, March 28, 2009, in
continuation of Onovo must be IGP, with this caption; Onovo: Not
Favour But The Right Thing Be done. Writing as if he is the
supreme Chief Security Officer of Nigeria, he said; ---I take my
reaction to the alleged moves by the Federal Government to deny DIG
Ogbonna Onovo the coveted position of Inspector General of Police [IGP]
when current IGP Sir Mike Okiro retires, from the point of view of
our incorrigibility---the assumption of this writer is probably that
Nigeria has no constitution that gives the President the power to
appoint anybody he wishes as the Inspector General of Police, from
the ranks of eligible police officers. This is what Senator Smart
Adeyemi probably talked about.
It has been suggested that the main
reason behind the encroachment of the media into issues that are
exclusively for security purpose, is the categorization of certain
establishments as belonging to civil service order. A situation
where the Police Force, Prisons Service, Custom Service and
Immigration Service are categorized as pure civil service
establishments is not healthy for national security; as who becomes
head according to civil service rule will continue to attract
mischievous media attention; this may in turn, affect internal
cohesion of these mentioned establishments negatively. It may also
affect the integrity of the President from the media that is firmly
in the hands of ambitious politician publishers. When the head of a
security outfit should retire must not be a function of media
speculation. The National Intelligence Agency and State Security
Services are security out fits with heads, yet they have clear
history of internal cohesion and smooth operation because leadership
succession is not on the basis of civil service rules.
Pronouncement:
Federal Government must as a matter of national
interest and securities re-categorize the positions of Inspector
General of Police [IGP] Comptroller General Of prisons [CGP]
Comptroller General of Immigration [CGP] and insulate them from
civil service rule or law. The amended rule may read thus: Any body
who attains 60 years of age or 35 years in service which ever comes
first must retire, except the heads of these establishments. There
is no doubt that if the retirement age of these set of paramilitary
outfits heads is solely determined by the president because of their
strategic nature, the country will be better for it, security wise.
What baffles me is that the Inspector General of Police, who the
constitution recognizes as a member of National Security Council is
still regarded as a core civil servant, whose retirement must follow
that order. Yet, police is not part of Nigerian Labour Congress [NLC],
they are not entitled to leave, just like the core civil servants.