The Federal Character Principle as a
Necessary Evil
By
Aliyu A. Ammani
aaammani@yahoo.co.uk
The composition of the Government of
the Federation or any of its agencies and the conduct of its affairs
shall be carried out in such a manner as to reflect the federal
character of Nigeria and the need to promote national unity, and also
to command national loyalty, thereby ensuring that there shall be no
predominance of persons from a few States or from a few ethnic or
other sectional groups in that Government or any of its agencies.
Constitution of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria: section 14 subsection (3)
The above provision of the Constitution
enshrined the federal character principle: arguably one of the most
controversial provisions of our Constitution. The Radio Nigeria phone
in programme, Radio-Link, of Saturday the 25th of
April brought this issue, once again, on the front burner. Its
repercussions reverberated in the last Saturday’s edition of the
programme. Conscious of the fact that mass enlightenment is an
inevitable weapon for the destruction of old and new myth, I decided
to commit pen to paper with a view to partaking, modestly, in this
worthwhile debate.
The phrase Federal Character was first
used by the late General Murtala Ramat Muhammed in his address to the
opening session of the Constitution Drafting Committee on Saturday the
18th of October 1975. Federal character of Nigeria,
according to the CDC’s report of 1977, refers to the distinctive
desire of the peoples of Nigeria to promote national unity, foster
national loyalty and give every citizen of Nigeria a sense of
belonging to the nation notwithstanding the diversities of ethnic
origin, culture, language or religion which may exist and which it is
their desire to nourish, harness to the enrichment of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria.
The federal character principle has its
root in the passion for fairness. The 50 wise-men that drafted the
1979 Constitution understand that passion. They, the 50 wise-men,
justify the entrenchment of the federal character principle in our
Constitution using the following words “There had in the past been
inter-ethnic rivalry to secure the domination of government by one
ethnic group or combination of ethnic groups to the exclusion of
others. It is therefore essential to have some provision to ensure
that the predominance of persons from a few States or from a few
ethnic or other sectional groups is avoided in the composition of
government, in the appointment or election of persons to high offices
in the state (see the CDC report of 1977).
People who felt threaten by this well
meant provision of the Constitution still oppose its entrenchment in
our Constitution. The chief argument of the opponent of the federal
character principle is that it undermines merit. For all intent and
purpose, if the letter of the federal character principle is to be
applied, I cannot see how merit could be completely sacrificed at the
altar of federal character. For one, there is always a minimum
requirement for appointment into any post within the federal civil
service, Armed Forces, the Police and any other agency of government.
I never heard of any situation where minimum requirement for any
particular post was dependent upon the candidates’ ethnic, religious,
geopolitical or State circumstances. Something like: candidates for
post A from States B, C, and D must have a minimum of University
degree with 3 years post qualification cognate experience while
candidates for the same post A from States X, Y, and Z must possess a
minimum of an Ordinary National Diploma with any number of years of
experience. I stand to be corrected.
Secondly, merit is not a closed shop. It
is not the exclusive preserve of any particular section, geopolitical
zone, State, or ethnic nationality. Again, I stand to be corrected.
Thirdly, who is to say that university graduates with better grades
end up making better employees or managers of resource than those with
lower grades? Or, paraphrasing A. M. Mainasara, who is to say that the
ability to fire a rifle is synonymous with handling a pen or writing a
good essay?
Opponents of the federal character
principle also argued that it has been used to accelerate the
promotion of mediocre and incompetent civil servants, military and
paramilitary officers into top positions, because advance in the
service is based on criteria derived from the federal character
representation. Not in today’s Nigeria. For in today’s Nigeria, there
is no agency of the Federal Government including the Civil Service,
the parastatals, the Armed Forces, the Police, the paramilitary etc.
where promotions are automatic and not based on the attainment of any
further requirement. Again, I stand to be corrected.
For reasons mostly self-centered,
several Nigerians continue to kick against this well meaning provision
of our Constitution; making strenuous effort to project a distorted
image of the principle.
I first came into contact with a
distorted perception of the federal character principle years ago
while serving the nation as an NYSC corps member. That distorted
perception was projected by a fellow corps member, an Ibo lady, and
graduate of the University of Nigeria Nsuka. She said they were told
by their lecturers at the UNN that federal character is employed even
in the grading process of WAEC examinations to the effect that a
distinction pass in the North was equivalent to a credit pass
in the south; a credit pass in the North is equivalent to an
ordinary pass in the South; while an ordinary pass in the
North is equal to an F9 in the South. When I posed to her the
question: What then is the equivalent of a northern F9 in the south,
she was lost for words. The sad fact of this misrepresentation of
reality was that the young university graduate believed what she was
saying then as some southerners today.
Another instance, some years ago when
the formers Inspector General of Police, the now embattled Tafa
Balogun effected the mass promotion of officers and men of the Nigeria
Police, whose promotions were long overdue, I had an encounter with a
newly promoted corporal who then resides in my neighborhood. I
congratulated him on his belated promotion and he answered “thank you,
but if I have been a ‘notana’, I would have been an Inspector
by now or even an ASP, you know promotions are faster and smoother for
‘notanas’ because of federal character”.
I can go on and on telling stories of
how the high achievements of many a northerner, accomplished through
hard work and perseverance, on the basis of merit, are devalued at the
currency of federal character. This is the price that we, northerners,
have to pay, though we are not the sole beneficiaries of the federal
character principle in the country. Apart from the disadvantaged
southern minorities, many a southerner poses as a disadvantaged
northerner to gain admission or secure employment.
The federal character principle is a
necessary evil that we, Nigerians, have to endure for now; it’s a
sacrifice we all have to make for the emergence of the just and
egalitarian society we all aspire to have. Hopefully, decades from now
when our body politic had developed sufficient immunity to the virus
of prejudice and discrimination, the federal character principle will
go the way of the dinosaur.
|