Virtual Reality In 4-19 Manoeuvres By Port
Harcourt, Nigeria. Friday, 29 August 2003 kombomasonbraide@msn.com Weapons
Of Mass Deception & Distraction: Sometime
in 1992, a police station in Pennsylvania, USA, received a phone call,
reporting that a black armed intruder had been sighted at a local
apartment complex. In response, two policemen rushed to the scene,
prepared to make an arrest. As they stood outside the building, one of
them peeped through a crack in a door, and saw
what seemed like a marauder in the dark passage at the top of the
stairs, holding a gun. Twice, the police officer ordered the apparent
intruder to drop his gun;
twice, his command was disregarded. However,
as the officer continued to peep, he noticed that the “intruder” looked very much like Eddie Murphy, a well-known
African American actor. Suddenly,
the policemen realised that they were in a mortal standoff with a cut-out cardboard effigy (of
Eddie Murphy holding a gun), taken out of a video shop, where it was
used to advertise a movie. Both the police informant, and the policemen,
had mistaken a semi-realistic imitation for what it imitated. Those
two policemen were the butt of comedians all over the USA after the
incident was widely reported in the local media. But their experience
was only a blown up version of something that happens daily
to millions of Nigerians, given that imitations
are now an all-encompassing element of reality in Nigeria. Like the
policemen in Pennsylvania, most Nigerians routinely suffer from simulation confusion: we easily confuse realistic fakes for what they imitate.
In some instances, such as the above, we are misled, accidentally, by imitations
that were never intended to be deceptive, in the first place. For
example, realistic toy guns are frequently mistaken for genuine firearms, an error
that has led to numerous fatal shoot-outs, oil field abductions, radio
station take-overs, fake armed
robberies, and even coups d’état
in Nigeria. Frequently,
we are being calculatingly hoodwinked, by people who have something to
gain by manipulating our consciousness with misleading appearances.
Indeed, much of Nigeria’s economy is based on providing Nigerians with
deceptive imitations, ranging from fake
medicines, “original Taiwanese” electronics, false bank accounts, fake
“genuine” spare parts, and
fake awards, degrees, and
certificates, to false eye
lashes, fake chieftaincy, and
academic titles, false gold
teeth, wigs, false
fingernails, false skin
complexions, “weave-ons”,
padded shoulders, designer perfumes to mask body odour, rainbow-tinted
contact lenses, fake buttocks,
fake religions, false
prophets, fake policemen, false
IDs, fake addresses, and even 4-19
elections, and now metamorphosed from “nascent”
democracy, to full-blown virtual
democracy. As a result, we find ourselves in a predicament, in which
we can no longer rely on the substantiation of our senses to tell us
what is really real in Nigeria
anymore. Worldwide,
the growing role of deceptive imitation
is particularly evident in fields like politics, defence, crime, and
security, which use disguises as part of strategies to outwit opponents.
For example, we find that military strategy is now based on
psychological warfare, especially by inducing maximum disorientation in
the enemy with such visual deceptions as missile decoys, stealth
bombers, and camouflage. Perhaps the most impressive example was the
creation of a dummy invasion force that was used to mislead the Iraqi
army in the final advance of US marines into Baghdad, during Gulf War
II. Less dignified are some American confident tricksters who once
placed a counterfeit ATM terminal in a Connecticut shopping centre, to
fool the public into feeding in their credit cards, and revealing their
account numbers and PIN (personal identification
numbers): 419 Americana.
Partisan
politics, defence, crime, and security provide good case examples of a
world brimming with all manner of expert dupes, impersonators,
imitators, pretenders, counterfeiters, and 419ers (including
the 419ed), in which some Nigerians routinely
manipulate appearances to get
what they want. When we look behind such fabricated appearances, what we
often find are advanced forms of art, science, and technology,
that make it possible for some Nigerian politicians, soldiers (retired
or serving), criminals, or/and policemen, to present a laundered
image of themselves, and of products, situations and ideas, that combine
elegantly to tell a beautiful story, the exact way they want their story
to be believed. Nigerians,
glued to their TV sets, are exposed to (although
not always fooled by) a daily barrage of subliminal suggestions, and
hard-core propaganda, fabricated in an effort to falsify the reality of
Nigerians, and control both their thinking, and behaviour. Definitely,
Nigeria is now dominated by assorted groups that use deceptive imitation
to gain and control power: i.e. information, wealth, and the management
of violence. The most rabid and adroit of these groups can be found in
partisan politics, the military, the police, business, and the media.
Their most important tool of deception is Nigeria’s primary simulation
factory - the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA) - which allows some
power sadists to manufacture complex simulations that can effectively
mislead Nigerians, en masse. The
public relations-driven world of Nigerian politicians portrays a
fantasy-loaded universe of fabricated glamour and mystique. Among the
several varieties of deception, advertising presents a utopia of human perfection and endless
celebration, for selling a Nigerian politician to Nigerians. Nigerian
politicians often give well-rehearsed, and choreographed performances,
specifically for the consumption of press cameras, complete with overtly
adoring sycophantic rented crowds for added effects, to create a
simulated identity, for sustained propagation in the media (newspapers,
tabloids, radio, television, or even in cyberspace), of politicians who, we are made to believe, embody
the desires of Nigerians. The Nigerian media, particularly the NTA,
which claims to provide a window onto national events, is itself
increasingly in the business of producing compelling dramas about high
wire risk taking, and foul play in the virtual reality of Nigerian
politics, where condemned “phantom” coup plotters spend less time in
prison than “detained” suspected assassins, given that beauty is in
the eye of the beholder. The
Nigerian media relies on, and applies a combination of the same
techniques: i.e. engineered or doctored scripts, a distorted sense of
loyalty, and achievements, “creative”
story telling, video expurgation, and electronic image manipulation, (made
popular during the so-called “phantom”, and “set-up” coup trials
of 1995 and 1997). They all end up telling stories that include the
usual elements: a mastery of danger, the capacity to effortlessly
satisfy the wishes of Nigerians, the ultimate restoration of the
collective self-worth of Nigerians, and guarantee of rosy future. Frantic
efforts are made to lure Nigerians to believe that the fabricated
stories actually accurately depict real
people, and real events. As a
result, the Nigerian media ends up profoundly falsifying what it
portrays, mixing up faithful and manipulated images, on the one hand,
and fact and fiction, on the other hand, in seamless possibilities, such
that it becomes progressively impossible to tell where fiction ends, and
fact begins, (or vice versa). An
example may be appreciated from the administrative and operational
structure of state television stations, whose news programmes are well
known for reciting a daily litany of woes,
(like oil spills, abductions, armed robberies, police extortion,
HIV/AIDS, obituaries, road accidents, crimes, personal and/or communal
disasters), with all the potential for evoking pity, fear, paranoia,
outrage, belligerence, or/and threat in the minds of their target
listeners, and/or viewers. However, this sensory bombardment of tales of
havoc and general mayhem is always spiced up, or framed by a larger
message of security, safety, and hope in the form of state-sponsored
philanthropy, including a massive overdose of unrelenting spiritual
opium, via televangelism, moral chauvinism and personal ethical
misinformation. The overall effect is the conception of another variant
of symbolic arena, indeed, a separate reality which gives viewers,
and/or listeners the feeling that their government is proficient in
containing threats and fears, (at
least by the special grace of some heavenly entities). What
is particularly telling is just how similar this paradigm is to those
found in many forms of pure fiction. Both fiction and
government-sponsored propaganda initially invoke empathy, anger,
expectations, fear, or/and sympathy in their audiences, and then convert
those same emotions into reassurance, and anticipation. Fiction
accomplishes this primarily with a happy ending. NTA does it by
embedding stories about danger, disaster, starvation, and suffering in
programmes that overflow with the benevolence and camaraderie of the
Nigerian political elite, including throwing in a good measure of other
stories with happy endings. Each, in a different way, is designed to
provide a satisfying emotional relief for their victims, the Nigerian
electorate. Fortunately,
as imitations and play-acting increase in magnitude and impact, a
learning process is beginning to take place, in which Nigerians are
developing new strategies for effectively unmasking executive deception.
One might say that Nigerians are seriously involved in a game of catch
up. As impersonators, pretenders, fakes, counterfeiters, and
political 4-19ers are becoming more convincing
by the year, Nigerians are getting adept at not
being fooled. The
Nigerian press is increasingly creating the false impression that it is
exposing executive deception. It is not. But then, whether or not it is
actually doing so, is trivial. A point of absurdity is reached when all
those pseudo-exposes create the impression that the Federal Government
of Nigeria is involved in some kind of top secret UFO cover-up. Here, simulation-busting
becomes the ultimate 419: a
fraud that creates the fraudulent impression of fraud. Kòmbò
Mason Braide
(PhD) Friday,
29 August 2003 @ 5:23 pm. I
welcome your comments (via e-mail: kombomasonbraide@msn.com),
and encourage this article to be freely reproduced, published,
photocopied, scanned, faxed, reprinted, reformatted, broadcast,
digitised, uploaded or downloaded, in whatever manner or form, with or
without acknowledgement or further permission.
|