Health
Interactive with Dr Aminu Magashi
World
Bank and health related MDGs
healthinteractive@hotmail.com
On Monday , 13th
December , 2004 , stakeholders from both Government and Civil Societies,
had a consultative meeting with the officials of World Bank at
Shagalinku Hotel in Kebbi State, over the new World Bank Project for
partnership with the Government of Nigeria. The Project titled 'Country
Assistance Strategy, ( CAS ) is billed to stretch from 2005 to
2007 .The meeting involved 9 states of
Northern Nigeria
(Kebbi , Sokoto, Zamfara,
Kano
,
Kaduna
,
Nasarawa
,
Niger
, Jigawa and Katsina). In attendance were the executive governors of
Jigawa and Kebbi states, in persons of Alh Saminu Turaki and Alh Adamu
Aliero respectively, whereas others were represented by their
Secretaries of state Government, and Commissioners. 14 representatives
of civil societies were in attendance,
this writer was present at that august gathering.
The consultation meeting
was obviously an attempt by World Bank to shift from its hitherto
arrogant approach of dishing out prescriptions to member nations,
without involving stakeholders and consultations before an intervention
is carried out. These sentiments and feelings were repeatedly mentioned
and shared by many stakeholders, especially from the government during
the opening ceremony. Issues highlighted were the need for the World
Bank to carry states along in designing and implementation of its
programmes, and projects should be result oriented, with the hope that
the meeting would not be a mere talk shop and paper work, and lastly
World Bank was encouraged to help and assist in shaping the thinking of
Nigerians towards sustainable development .
The Country
Assistance Strategy (CAS) is the World Bank business plan and
document for assistance in
Nigeria
, and it is going to utilize the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) as
indicators, and this is being designed in partnership with Governments
at various levels, Department for International Development (DFID),
UK
and in consultation with a wide range of stakeholders. The purpose of
Nigeria’s CAS is to achieve development results by supporting
Nigeria’s sustainable economic growth program (such as NEEDS),
assisting Nigeria to attaining of the MDGs, which came into existence as
a result of the Millennium declaration of 2000, signed by 189 countries
including Nigeria, and they are accepted as a frame work for measuring
development progress .The principles for development assistance in
Nigeria’s CAS will be focus on results, leverage on comparative
advantage and selectivity. The three selective result packages of the
CAS would be to improve basic services for human development, improve
environment and services for non oil growth, and enhancing transparency,
accountability and participation for better governance. On the result
packages , my concern today will be centred on improved basic services
which focus on efficient service delivery for human development in
selected states , e.g. Health, improved access to HIV/AIDS prevention ,
care and treatment , focus on children and improved data , analysis and
bench marking, to enhance social impact (demand and supply).
While I commend the World Bank for taking time off to organise a
consultation meeting for its new project, CAS, I sincerely hope it was
not a waste of time, and the Bank will incorporate if not all, some of
the recommendations provided by stakeholders. In this way Nigerian’s
will put in their best for its implementation. To begin with , one of
the cardinal principles of CAS is to assist
Nigeria
in achieving Millennium Development goals ( MDGs). Attainment of such
goals will be a Herculean task, looking at past experiences of so many
goals which even before reaching the target, became mere slogans.
Amongst them are , Health For All By The Year 2000, Housing For All
,Vision 2010 , Capé Town Declaration On Measles And Roll Back Malaria
.There are three directly health related MDGs, MDGs 4, 5 and 6, that
focus on Reducing Child Mortality, Improve Maternal Health and Combat
HIV/AIDS, Malaria and other diseases, respectively. MDG 4 is aiming at
reducing the child mortality by about 66 %, and MDG 5 is looking at
reducing maternal mortality rate by 75 %, and MDG 6 is looking at
combating HIV/AIDS, and reducing its prevalence among youths by 25 %,
and halting the effect of malaria and other diseases. All these are
expected to happen by the year 2015. Looking at these ambitious goals ,
one will feel sorry for Africa and Nigeria in particular, because many
of the African states lack the wherewithal and coherent plan to
implement such, rather they are pitiably waiting for institutions like
World Bank , DFID, and other development partners to come to their
rescue.
The CAS document has among its components, Children, it is hoped that
business as usual should not be adhered to , which is typical of what
development partners and their government collaborators are currently
doing, a window dressing approach to the plight of Nigerian children.
The problems of children need to be looked upon from the angle of what
are the factors causing the high infant and under five mortality rates,
which are among the highest in the world. Understanding the problem will
ensure developing programmes that will ensure the reduction of the
mortality rates. Addressing one particular disease while abandoning
others will never be the solution to curtail the problems, the approach
should be integrated in such a way that one programme supports another
one towards achieving the goal 4.
On the issue of goal 5 which attempts to reduce the maternal mortality
rate by 75 %, it is very disheartening to know that in some states , the
rate has reached up to 2000 per 100,000 life births. Women die every day
due to preventable complications of pregnancy, labour and puerperum. The
maternal health sector is in terrible shambles, and is in dire need of
support to capacity building and training of staff to manage such
places, facilities for emergency obstetric services, and a wide range of
awareness creation, towards the importance of antenatal care. I believe
if the World Bank is serious about Safe Motherhood, CAS should be able
to support states and LGAs towards improving the maternal health sector.
World Bank as we all know is a partner of Roll Back Malaria project,
that was launched in Nigeria in April 2000. Unfortunately halving the
malaria burden by 2010 in Nigeria, has remained a mirage and a fantasy,
and the reason is not far fetched, Government of the day and its Roll
Back Malaria partners (WHO, UNICEF, World Bank, UNDP and DFID) are more
interested in selective approach of marketing and distributing
Insecticide Treated Mosquito Nets, though not free of charge to the
populace. As I mentioned many times on these pages, 5 years into the
intervention, we are not even closer to the reduction by 25%. If the
World Bank is serious about CAS, the financial institutions should
provide credit and grants to states towards environmental
sustainability, amongst others, like providing good drainage system and
clearing of contaminated gutters and refuse dumps, and good town
planning. That way, Nigeria and Africa can celebrate achieving Roll Back
Malaria and MDG 6. Lastly on HIV/AIDS the approach should be
supporting states to be involved in the Anti Retro Viral Drugs
Programme to ensure reduction of HIV prevalence among youths by
25 %. One area which the CAS document has omitted, is focusing on Youths
which are the most vulnerable groups to contract HIV/AIDS. There is the
need for programmes tailored towards reduction of youth unemployment
rate and redundancy. Overall, I hope at the end of the day, the
consultation would not be a mere talk shop, but a forum that will
achieve its desired aim of consultation and partnership towards
implementing CAS.
Dr Magashi is the
Executive Director , Community Health and Research Initiative , Kano ,
Nigeria and can be reached at healthinteractive@hotmail.com
|