HEALTH INTERACTIVE WITH DR. AMINU MAGASHI

The Task Before the Arewa Media Forum

healthinteractive@hotmail.com

April 22, 2004

Going by the pronouncement of National Programme On Immunization ( NPI ), the third round  of National Immunization Days ( NIDs ) will hold between 24th and 27th, April, 04,  this is  in  pursuance of the federal government's determination to interrupt the transmission of polio virus  and put a final push to the polio eradication by the end of 2004. In some states in northern Nigeria, if at all they are participating in the NID, theirs would be the first round of NID, a typical example is Kano state which has not participated in the first and second round of NID , due to the fact  that , its committee of investigation on polio had discovered a contaminant within the vaccine it received from NPI.

Whether Kano is participating or not, that left to be seen, up to the time I am writing this piece, there was no pubic statement by the state on that matter, however information emanating from the federal government is that, the FG has abandoned the former vaccines being used in the country and has ordered a fresh ones from a different manufacturers and in a different country entirely and states are enjoyed to collect their allocation at random. Well, on that development, we hope the vaccines this time around are free of such contaminants discovered before. The lesson learnt over the polio controversy indicated that almost all the antagonists of polio eradication  all willing to resume eradication as long as the vaccines are free of contamination. Also as mentioned in the past, Kano state government is reportedly willing to stage a come back if they are convince that the vaccine are free and safe, if that is confirmed, we expect the Mallam Shekarau administration to honourably make a statement on the willingness of the state  to commence the process of  NIDs, the state, the country and the world in general cannot afford to have another child crippled courtesy of this imbroglio that is supposed to have being put to rest long ago.

Just as all stakeholders are gearing up for the exercise , a very pathetic, unexpected and disheartening message hit the internet on 14th, April, 2004 on the World Health Organization's Website ( WHO ), the story entitled  ' polio virus has been reported in Botswana, a country which had been polio free since 1991, the virus has been closely linked genetically to polio virus endemic to northern Nigeria , the case - a seven year old boy from Ngami district of north- western Botswana had onset of paralysis on 8th February, 04. it went further to say that, as of March, 2004 ,  all states in Nigeria with the exception of Kano has resumed mass polio immunization activities, the polio case in Botswana underlies the magnitude of the risk posed to polio free areas by the polio outbreaks in west and central Africa and is compounded by the growing vulnerability of populations to polio globally, following cessation of preventive polio immunization campaigns in most polio free countries in 2002/03. Children across Africa will continue to be at risk of polio from such importations until the disease is eradicated every where.

When ever a selected case of onset of paralysis due to polio virus is discovered in some African countries, WHO is always ever ready and willing to point a one directional accusing finger to northern Nigeria, it has happened before when some cases were discovered in some previously polio free countries like Benin, Burkino Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Cote D 'Ivoire, Ghana, Togo and now Botswana. It is glaringly obvious that one directional accusation certainly is not the best option and such portrays the respected body as being myopic and appears to be used and hijacked politically to cajole and intimidate northern states particularly Kano to accept polio immunization despite its short comings in terms of advocacy and implementation in Nigeria.

WHO should have done better like in the case of Botswana case to compare the genetic component of the newly discovered virus and the ones stored in 1991 when the last case of polio was seen in that country . I will like to remind the world body that polio eradication initiative is not in any way wiping out  the polio virus from earth surface, a natural organism found in   water and soil, but rather the programme and the vaccination is only interrupting chain of transmission of polio virus , hence the eradication of the disease , as such, if there is any new case of the disease   in some previously free countries, it could be possible that a contamination  has taken place between sewage  and  soil or  water  with the   food of such community and through feco- oral route the virus enters  a non immune child. Never the less, it is still possible for the virus to reach other African countries from northern Nigeria, but that route is very remote and the chance is very rear.

After saying all these, with delight when I received a formal invitation to attend an interactive section being organized by Arewa Media Forum (AMF) at Arewa House in Kaduna state on Saturday, 17th, April 04, I accepted such gesture with the hope of attending to rub minds with other stakeholders with the aim of moving forward on polio controversy. The theme of the conference  " lessons learned on polio controversy for immunization progrmme in Nigeria had provided a flat form  to look back with the hope of urging ahead for the survival, protection, participation and development of Nigerian children . I am aware that a communiqué would be release for the public to know all about the conference, how ever, never the less, the aim of this write up is to call the attention of the AMF that what they did by bringing stakeholders on that interactive session was to provide a means to carry the courageous effort beyond that one day meeting, because certainly if they stop at that level, it is tantamount to puncturing a fresh wound without providing a treatment. I personally see AMF as a twin sister to Arewa Consultative Forum ( ACF ), while the latter is addressing issues  towards political solutions, the former is addressing issues toward developmental  solutions ., which polio saga  to me is one of such.

In line with that, I envisaged the need for AMF to facilitate the emergence of an advocacy committee derived from media moguls, civil societies, activist, academicians, health and social experts who will be tasked with the following responsibility, amongst others.

1. Providing advocacy to international donor agencies (IDAs) to have a grasp of the health needs of our societies and the best approach to address such, that form of advocacy will assist the IDAs to be able to properly prioritize, understand certain grey areas to achieve maximum results.

2. Advocacy to federal institutions and states to ensure implementing people oriented projects and investing more in health.

3. Advocacy to other stakeholders and gate keepers in form of writing, discussion, visitation and organizing fora with the aim of sensitization and awareness creation to conform and reach a consensus with genuine international health agendas and programmes.

For now, the only one way advocacy seen all the time is when ever an international project suffers a set back, the founders and initiators (IDAs) and some selected government officials and health experts amongst others will make a futile move  and rush to reverse such.